Teams

The Elevennis Players

2025 Pine Belt Singles League · 3.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-15vs Malone 3.0 SinglesLost 12
W#1 SinglesAlen Hajnal vs Shea Malone6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesEthan Moore vs Chandler Laudenheimer3-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesTom Hall vs Michael Butler1-6, 1-6
2025-12-09Won 20
W#1 SinglesAlen Hajnal vs Chris Hester6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJeremy Deans vs Matt Anderson6-1, 6-0
2025-12-08vs Malone 3.0 SinglesWon 21
W#1 SinglesAlen Hajnal vs Allen Boleware6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesWill Stevens vs Michael Butler6-4, 6-4
L#3 SinglesRoberto Amay vs Bobby Hanson2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-12-01vs Malone 3.0 SinglesWon 21
W#1 SinglesJeremy Deans vs Bobby Hanson7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesWill Stevens vs Derek Tait6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesEthan Moore vs Michael Butler3-6, 1-6
2025-11-18vs CanebrakeLost 12
L#1 SinglesRoberto Amay vs Patrick Dauphin3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesWill Stevens vs Paul Drambar7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesTom Hall vs Matt Anderson6-2, 6-1
2025-10-28vs CanebrakeLost 12
L#1 SinglesAlen Hajnal vs Paul Drambar1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesRoberto Amay vs Jason Moss6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesTom Hall vs Adam Franklin2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Alen Hajnal
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.96
Jeremy Deans
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.79
Roberto Amay
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.77
Will Stevens
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.62
Ethan Moore
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.51
Tom Hall
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeremy Deans + Will Stevens1437% games−4.1% vs expected
Will Stevens + Ethan Moore4251% gamesnot enough data
Jeremy Deans + Alen Hajnal404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alen Hajnal
60W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.15
Jeremy Deans
20W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
2.96
Roberto Amay
35W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.79
Will Stevens
17W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.77
Ethan Moore
12W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.62
Tom Hall
5W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.