Teams

Slaton-Devall/18/5.5/CWN/CP

2026 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 5.5 NO (18&O) Women Night

16 players · average NTRP / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 8 7:00 PM
City Park Tennis Center
Sep 15 7:00 PM
City Park Tennis Center
Sep 22 7:00 PM
City Park Tennis Center
Sep 29 7:00 PM
City Park Tennis Center
Oct 5 7:00 PM
City Park Tennis Center
Oct 13 7:00 PM
City Park Tennis Center
Oct 19 7:00 PM
City Park Tennis Center
2026-08-31vs Dadlez/18/5.5/CWN/CPLost 12
L#1 DoublesShannon Sims / Kelly Phillips vs Sarah Helm / Sydney Kastner4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLiesa Smith / Megan Misko vs Katy Schell / Kristyn Dadlez6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Thomas / Rebecca Mercer vs Marisa Rovira / Taryn Jones4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 5.5 NO (18&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Dadlez/18/5.5/CWN/CP000000
2Perino/18/5.5/CWN/CP000000
3Slaton-Devall/18/5.5/CWN/CP000000
4Nickels/18/5.5/CWN/CP000000
5Oest-Larsen/18/5.5/CWN/MCC000000
6Berniard/18/5.5/CWN/CP000000
7Ackerman/18/5.5/CWN/CP000000
8Lewis/18/5.5/CWN/XU000000
9Ferraro/Held/18/5.5/CWN/CP000000
10Dean/18/5.5/CWN/CP000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Erin Kavanagh
published
2.58
Kimberly Ellis
published
2.53
Rachel Archey
published
2.34
Stacy Boue
published
2.19
Megan Misko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.94
Kelly Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.91
Susan Dinneen
published
1.86
Erin Hall
published
Eileen Devall
published
Enid Fahrenholt
published
Erin Saucier
published
Kerrie Slaton
published
Liesa Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Merideth Eldridge
published
Rebecca Mercer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shannon Sims
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Kavanagh
6W–11L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Kimberly Ellis
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%27%73%
2.58
Rachel Archey
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
0%41%59%
2.53
Stacy Boue
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
Megan Misko
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Kelly Phillips
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Susan Dinneen
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Erin Hall
1W–7L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Eileen Devall
4W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Enid Fahrenholt
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Erin Saucier
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kerrie Slaton
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Liesa Smith
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Merideth Eldridge
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rebecca Mercer
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Shannon Sims
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.