Teams

SC-Boinski

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spokane · 3.0 WOMEN Spokane

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-27vs SC-McCannWon 10
W#3 DoublesTerri Dahm / Susan Boinski vs Kathi Plager / Karen Barrett6-3, 6-4
2022-03-20vs SRC-ChessarLost 02
L#2 DoublesTerri Dahm / Susan Boinski vs Teri Alexander / Diane Tunnell4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChelsea Healey / Tiana Bargel vs Pamela Currier / Anne Currier4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-03-11vs SRC-ChessarLost 12
W#2 DoublesTiana Bargel / Chelsea Healey vs Anne Currier / Pamela Currier6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJessica Greenfield vs Stephanie Butler6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Boinski / Terri Dahm vs Rasa Morris / Natalie Sandberg6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2022-02-27vs SC-McCannSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSusan Boinski / Jessica Greenfield vs Jeana Paventy / Laura Silvey4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJan Hardenbrook / Chelsea Healey vs Karen Barrett / Alyssa Walsh6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2022-02-12vs SRC-ChessarWon 21
L#1 SinglesTiana Bargel vs Marianne Thompson1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChelsea Healey / Jan Hardenbrook vs Judith Noel / Stephanie Heller6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Boinski / Jessica Greenfield vs Teri Alexander / Judy Chessar4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-01-29vs SC-McCannLost 03
L#1 SinglesTiana Bargel vs Ramona Higashi3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Boinski / Jessica Greenfield vs Kayla Romane / Lisa Violette4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChelsea Healey / Jan Hardenbrook vs Jeana Paventy / Karen Barrett3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 WOMEN Spokane
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SC-McCann51191124239
2SRC-Chessar33141637278
3SC-Boinski15121838292

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Monica Blykowski-May
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.96
Alyson Gamache
usually #2 Singles 63%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3
2.88
Jessica Greenfield
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.71
Marie Lambert
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.37
Susan Boinski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jan Hardenbrook
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Judy Stone
published
Terri Dahm
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tiana Bargel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marie Lambert + Monica Blykowski-May111050% games+2.4% vs expected
Jessica Greenfield + Susan Boinski4549% games−7.8% vs expected
Terri Dahm + Susan Boinski42036% games−9.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Monica Blykowski-May
39W–37L career · 7 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
3
Alyson Gamache
28W–30L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
2.96
Jessica Greenfield
36W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
2.88
3
Marie Lambert
73W–65L career · 7 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Susan Boinski
9W–38L career · 6 lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
2.37
Jan Hardenbrook
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Judy Stone
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Terri Dahm
5W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tiana Bargel
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.