Teams

Heitman, Bryan

2022 Adult 40 & Over 3.0 - 5.0 - Weekend · 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-03-05vs HOA/Wohlers/40&Over3.5MLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Cloyde / John Schlueter vs Luis Gonzalez Saiz / Tim Burnett0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTroy Parks / Garrett Gerleman vs Mark McDonald / Steve Fabrizius4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBryan Heitman / Glenn Tott vs Randall Jensen / Charles Wohlers7-6, 6-2
2022-02-12vs Wimmer, EricLost 12
W#1 DoublesB Keith Campbell / Andrew Cloyde vs Alex Che / Robert Madison6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTroy Parks / Garrett Gerleman vs Chan Kim / Chris Long1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesArchie Michael / Glenn Tott vs Andrew Wimmer / Eric Wimmer3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Garrett Gerleman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
B Keith Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Andrew Cloyde
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Bryan Heitman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Archie Michael
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Brad Kleindl
published
Glenn Tott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Schlueter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
NICHOLAS BRALLEY
published
Stuart Carrico
published
Troy Parks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Troy Parks + Garrett Gerleman4357% games+8.6% vs expected
Stuart Carrico + B Keith Campbell1540% games−7.0% vs expected
NICHOLAS BRALLEY + Troy Parks0537% gamesnot enough data
Bryan Heitman + Troy Parks123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Garrett Gerleman
52W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
B Keith Campbell
36W–45L career · 1 line in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Andrew Cloyde
17W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Bryan Heitman
25W–36L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Archie Michael
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Brad Kleindl
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Glenn Tott
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
John Schlueter
10W–41L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
NICHOLAS BRALLEY
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stuart Carrico
16W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Troy Parks
23W–31L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.