Teams

Flanagan 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PM

2024 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women 18 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-05vs Yates J. 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PMWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaura Loftin / Emily Wilson vs Cassidy MacKay / Kathryn Fleihan6-4, 7-6
2024-09-11vs Bodine/Lane 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PMLost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Wilson / Laura Loftin vs Leslie Hemric / Erin Bodine5-7, 0-6
2024-08-21vs Pollina 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PMLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Loftin / Emily Wilson vs Shannon Roley / Patty Craig2-6, 4-6
2024-08-07vs ESSON 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PMSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLaura Loftin / Emily Wilson vs Tammy Dunn / Myra Propst6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLayne Saunders / Heather Hill vs Maria Pincus / Kim Edwards3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Layne Saunders
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.34
Rosa Phillips
published
3.32
Reeves Rhoten
published
3.30
Britt Flanagan
published 3.5
3.11
Jen Strasser
published
3.08
Meghan Hilleboe
published
3.04
Emily Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Mary Winstead
published
2.97
Laura Loftin
published
2.85
Amy Kemp
published 3
2.84
Annetta Bartle
published 3
2.77
Gail Terrell
published
Heather Hill
published
Melinda Billings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annetta Bartle + Gail Terrell213 matchesnot enough data
Annetta Bartle + Laura Loftin303 matchesnot enough data
Meghan Hilleboe + Laura Loftin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Layne Saunders
151W–74L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.87
Rosa Phillips
13W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
Reeves Rhoten
30W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Britt Flanagan
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Jen Strasser
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
Meghan Hilleboe
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
3.08
Emily Wilson
178W–123L career · 4 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
Mary Winstead
15W–22L career · no lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
3.02
Laura Loftin
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Amy Kemp
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Annetta Bartle
15W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
Gail Terrell
18W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Heather Hill
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melinda Billings
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.