Teams

Bardmoor Gross

2026 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 W Sat (4 cts)

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-20vs Ardea SweetshotsWon 30
W#1 DoublesTamara Tindell / Emily Signoracci vs Karen Braudis / Mary Bandes6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaribel Gross / Joanne O Ryan vs Noella Burgeson / Ana Jara6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChristine Campbell / Kathleen Betancourt vs Noela Fries / Fayola Goldstone6-3, 6-3
2026-06-13vs Seminole Lake Smash GirlsWon 21
L#1 DoublesDebbie Dawson / Emily Signoracci vs Karen Fischer / Kim Poynter4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesTamara Tindell vs Dolores Salazar6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Betancourt / Terri Kiefer vs Martha Cornatzer / Stacey Castellini6-0, 6-1
2026-06-06vs SPTC Holliday 3.5 WWon 31
W#1 DoublesDeborah Larsen / Kristine Genovese vs Diane Haymes / Jennifer Hobbs6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAnne Remie vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTamara Tindell / Danielle Haggar vs Kenzier McIntyre / Zilya Ruga4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRuth Barnett / SANDRA CARTER vs Cathrine Chin / Monica Vernon6-4, 6-1
2026-05-30vs Seminole Lake PriceWon 31
W#1 DoublesDeborah Larsen / Kristine Genovese vs Sally Blush / Loretta Lombardi6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJoanne O Ryan vs Jennifer Botelho2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRuth Barnett / Anne Remie vs Jayne Lewis / Lina Chaves1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTamara Tindell / Danielle Haggar vs Beth McCray / Edie Clator6-3, 6-4
2026-05-16vs PINELLAS/RodriguesLost 04
L#1 DoublesJill MacNeil / Christine Campbell vs Carrie Kilgroe / Christina Carnahan5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJoanne O Ryan vs Kalley Phillips2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Larsen / Kristine Genovese vs Krista Missbach / Kristin McCormick2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Remie / Maribel Gross vs Elizabeth Pento / Amanda Sills1-6, 4-6
2026-05-09vs Innisbrook Forty LoveWon 31
L#1 DoublesKristine Genovese / Deborah Larsen vs Mona Patel / Suzanne Gardner4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJoanne O Ryan vs Maresol Wehner6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebbie Dawson / Ruth Barnett vs Veronica Sullivan / Donna Denhof6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJill MacNeil / Terri Kiefer vs Terry Kelsey / Terry Lawrence4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-04-25vs RCSP FaraciSplit 22
L#1 DoublesChristine Campbell / Emily Signoracci vs Shelly Watkins / Celeste Bittner0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesTamara Tindell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMaribel Gross / Anne Remie vs Kerry Dobbs / Corrie Stover6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJill MacNeil / Danielle Haggar vs Nona Pucciariello / Linda Mulcahy0-6, 4-6
2026-04-18vs McMullen Ebony & IvoryLost 13
L#1 DoublesChristine Campbell / Joanne O Ryan vs Joan Whitten / Tricia Lolkus5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesTamara Tindell vs Eileen Rodriguez7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRuth Barnett / Anne Remie vs Kim Williams / Esthela Gonzalez7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDanielle Haggar / Terri Kiefer vs Maggie Berning / Moise Carrington2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Sat (4 cts) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Tamara Tindell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.44
Emily Signoracci
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Joanne O Ryan
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.43
SANDRA CARTER
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Kathleen Betancourt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Debbie Dawson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Kristine Genovese
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Deborah Larsen
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.30
Terri Kiefer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Anne Remie
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.26
Ruth Barnett
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.22
Danielle Haggar
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Maribel Gross
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Christine Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Jill MacNeil
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Haggar + Tamara Tindell4160% games−2.5% vs expected
Kristine Genovese + Deborah Larsen3254% gamesnot enough data
Christine Campbell + Emily Signoracci3254% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Dawson + Anne Remie303 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Betancourt + Christine Campbell213 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Betancourt + Terri Kiefer303 matchesnot enough data
Maribel Gross + Ruth Barnett123 matchesnot enough data
Maribel Gross + Anne Remie123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tamara Tindell
97W–50L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
Emily Signoracci
15W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
Joanne O Ryan
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
SANDRA CARTER
11W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
Kathleen Betancourt
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Debbie Dawson
18W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Kristine Genovese
8W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Deborah Larsen
7W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
Terri Kiefer
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Anne Remie
136W–73L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Ruth Barnett
8W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Danielle Haggar
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Maribel Gross
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Christine Campbell
8W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Jill MacNeil
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.