Teams

WIKIUP R SC CM7.5A

2024 COMBO · Men 7.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-24vs FOUNTAINGROVE-AC CM7.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesBrian Johnson / Douglas Oclassen vs Randall Watkins / Gabe Manville6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-10-02vs FOUNTAINGROVE-AC CM7.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrad Swadling / Brian Johnson vs Andrew Aviles / Matt Walls6-1, 6-3
2024-09-12vs FOUNTAINGROVE-AC CM7.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesRazi Arifuddin / Brian Johnson vs Todd Hewlin / Matt Walls6-7, 4-6
2024-08-28vs PETALUMA TA/LEGHORNS PK CM7.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Johnson / Roy Peterka vs Jacob Wade / Alan Pilgrim6-1, 3-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Jamin Ruark
published 4
3.98
Roy Peterka
published
3.96
Brian Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.88
Weldon Ryckman
published
3.85
Brad Swadling
published 4
3.81
Nathan Strong
published
Douglas Oclassen
published 4
3.73
Jon Moens
published
3.73
Daniel Musgrove
published 3.5
3.73
Philippe Hobson
published
3.66
Selvan Ekambaram
published
3.46
Craig Lucas
published 3.5
3.26
ERIC SOTHERN
published 3.5
3.25
Tom Andrews
published
3.25
Abdel Aziz Zhari
published 3.5
Razi Arifuddin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roy Peterka + Nathan Strong11065% games+10.8% vs expected
Brad Swadling + Jamin Ruark404 matchesnot enough data
Abdel Aziz Zhari + Selvan Ekambaram314 matchesnot enough data
Craig Lucas + Philippe Hobson213 matchesnot enough data
Philippe Hobson + Daniel Musgrove213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jamin Ruark
21W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.98
Roy Peterka
14W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Brian Johnson
77W–55L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.96
Weldon Ryckman
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Brad Swadling
18W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
3.85
Nathan Strong
14W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Douglas Oclassen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jon Moens
10W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Daniel Musgrove
16W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.73
Philippe Hobson
27W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.73
Selvan Ekambaram
25W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%11%89%
3.66
3.5
Craig Lucas
19W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
ERIC SOTHERN
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
Tom Andrews
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Abdel Aziz Zhari
7W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Razi Arifuddin
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.