Teams

Mar.Combs55A

2024 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-04vs Jo.Bruckel55AWon 20
W#1 DoublesMark Combs / John VanDeWater vs Alan Crews / OLLI-PEKKA Salovaara1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRick Pfeiffer / Chris Saillant vs John Bruckel / Michael Hamlett6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2024-05-02vs Ja.Sage55ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesDayn Harum / Mark Combs vs Tony Houser / Joe Murphy5-3
W#3 DoublesRay Goldberg / John VanDeWater vs Mike Pearce / Sean Ahr6-2, 6-2
2024-04-25vs Da.McNeill55AWon 10
W#1 DoublesDayn Harum / John VanDeWater vs Jeff Chaffin / Larry Essary6-1, 6-2
2024-04-09vs Ja.Sage55ALost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn VanDeWater / Linh Nguyen vs John Gearing / Tony Houser1-6, 0-6
2024-04-04vs Bil.Francis55AWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn VanDeWater / Rick Pfeiffer vs Larry Gregory Williams / Bill Francis6-3, 6-4
2024-03-21vs Da.McNeill55AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn VanDeWater / Christopher Lloyd vs David McNeill / Mark Zimmerman6-1, 6-1
2024-03-14vs Ke.Nowell55ALost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Saillant / John VanDeWater vs Tom Morrow / Bryan Simpson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-03-07vs Jo.Bruckel55ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn VanDeWater / Dayn Harum vs OLLI-PEKKA Salovaara / Jack Pyritz7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChris Saillant / Mark Combs vs Michael Marchi / Alan Crews5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Dayn Harum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Mark Combs
published
3.74
Chris Saillant
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
John VanDeWater
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.43
Ray Goldberg
published
3.42
Ken Glanville
published
3.35
David Zatz
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John VanDeWater + Dayn Harum9557% games+5.4% vs expected
Ray Goldberg + David Zatz404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dayn Harum
70W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.95
Mark Combs
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Chris Saillant
70W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
4
John VanDeWater
146W–114L career · 8 lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
Ray Goldberg
13W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
Ken Glanville
18W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
David Zatz
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.