Teams

BLACKHAWK CC 40MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Ly / Beth Negrete vs Jason Ehrlich / Shirley Valero2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-20vs CROW CANYON CC 40MX7.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Ly / Rose Spicer vs Emily Amott / Chris Picht6-3, 6-1
2025-06-25vs BAY CLUB PL 40MX7.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesTina Ly / David Ly vs Jennifer Do / Zhonghua Zheng0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Allyson Garcia
published 4
3.53
Ashok Ganesan
published 3.5
3.52
Thomas Lee
published
3.43
Lara Facteau
published
3.33
Rob Thomas
published
3.32
Scott Takishita
published
3.31
Saurabh Shrivastava
published
3.30
Ramya Jayaraman
published
3.29
Marissa Purkiss
published
3.27
David Hsieh
published 3.5
3.27
David Ly
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Jill Fissel
published
3.19
Rose Spicer
published
3.16
Gregory de la Pena
published
3.15
Julie Lassig
published
2.94
Michelle Saunders
published
2.89
William Facteau
published
2.89
Tina Ly
published
2.67
Beth Negrete
published 3
Francisco Marin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashok Ganesan + Ramya Jayaraman4161% gamesnot enough data
Tina Ly + William Facteau224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Allyson Garcia
18W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.95
3.5
Ashok Ganesan
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Thomas Lee
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Lara Facteau
27W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Rob Thomas
18W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Scott Takishita
14W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Saurabh Shrivastava
16W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Ramya Jayaraman
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Marissa Purkiss
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
David Hsieh
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
David Ly
48W–84L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Jill Fissel
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Rose Spicer
7W–18L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Gregory de la Pena
3W–17L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Julie Lassig
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Michelle Saunders
14W–32L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
William Facteau
24W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Tina Ly
12W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Beth Negrete
4W–13L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Francisco Marin
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.