Teams

KC-RH RED

2024 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME

7 players · average NTRP 2.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-18vs NJ YELLOWLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatty Archuleta / Melanie Shults vs Kathleen Harvey / Jacqueline Marquis3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-06-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesPatty Archuleta / Amy Green vs Michelle Applehans / Katie Chapman6-0, 7-6
2024-06-04vs CCC NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeslie Aranjo / Patty Archuleta vs Jennifer Asbury / Tig Ogdon3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-05-28vs MC YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelanie Shults / Leslie Aranjo vs Sharlene Funk / Jola Bennett2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesPatty Archuleta / Amy Green vs Jillian Clark / Amy Hank6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2024-05-22vs LEBTC NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Madison / Patty Archuleta vs Deborah Cartwright / Kristine Johnson6-4, 6-0
2024-05-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesPatty Archuleta / Amy Green vs Andrea Hei / Katie Chapman6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Abby Smith
published 3
2.81
Julie Madison
published
2.78
Patty Archuleta
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.34
Leslie Aranjo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Kathleen Antony
published 2.5
1.99
Amy Green
published 2.5
1.91
Carrie Secondo
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Aranjo + Kathleen Antony9164% gamesnot enough data
Amy Green + Carrie Secondo033 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Aranjo + Patty Archuleta123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Abby Smith
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
Julie Madison
20W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Patty Archuleta
75W–149L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
2.5
Leslie Aranjo
87W–75L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Kathleen Antony
51W–73L career · no lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Amy Green
7W–15L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.99
2.5
Carrie Secondo
4W–20L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.