Teams

OSTC - BYRD

2025 Combo Doubles 18 & Over-GC · Men 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-15vs Biloxi - McCarrollLost 02
L#1 DoublesLennon Rea / Reuben Byrd vs Tristan Bourcy / TYLER MAHER2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBruce Pate / Kevin Martin vs Logan Gibson / Wade Hardy3-6, 4-6
2025-10-02vs TOCC DAHL 18Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLennon Rea / Reuben Byrd vs Jack Moore / Otto M Vuyovich6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDoug Nash / William Troutman vs Bill Descher / Brendon Confer5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKevin Martin / Bruce Pate vs Charles Wilson / Josh Lang4-6, 0-6
2025-09-22vs Biloxi - McCarrollLost 03
L#1 DoublesRon Carstens / Lennon Rea vs Austin Baskin / Drew Adams0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesA Chapman / Tony Chapman vs Ryan Canon / Damien Colbet0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKevin Martin / William Troutman vs Matthew SooHoo / Logan Gibson7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-09-08vs BBTC - Hutchinson 18 7.5 comboLost 03
L#1 DoublesTony Chapman / Reuben Byrd vs Jackson Ward / Jeffrey Ward1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKlayton Pace / William Troutman vs Evan Chubb / Gage Switzer3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLennon Rea / Bruce Pate vs Shane Hutchinson / Todd Bradford5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-25vs TOCC DAHL 18Lost 12
W#1 DoublesReuben Byrd / Duane Mcpeek vs James Lang / Jack Moore6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRon Carstens / Kevin Martin vs Otto M Vuyovich / Bill Descher3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJosh Martin / Tony Chapman vs Lee Gabardi / Charles Wilson2-6, 2-2
2025-08-19vs BBTC - Hutchinson 18 7.5 comboLost 03
L#1 DoublesReuben Byrd / Lennon Rea vs Ryland Buford / Jeffrey Ward1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Martin / Bruce Pate vs Evan Chubb / Dan Adams2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDoug Nash / Terry Gene Cook vs Johnny Hisaw / Robert Barnes Lll4-6, 2-6
2025-08-04vs BBTC-MATTHEWS 7.5 MENWon 30
W#1 DoublesDuane Mcpeek / Reuben Byrd vs Ethan Thomas / Matthew Brashier7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKlayton Pace / Ron Carstens vs Benjamin Powers / William Hasty6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLennon Rea / Josh Martin vs Craig Brown / Corey Creel6-1, 6-2
2025-07-28vs BBTC-MATTHEWS 7.5 MENLost 12
L#1 DoublesLennon Rea / Ron Carstens vs Ethan Thomas / Jeff Descher4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTony Chapman / A Chapman vs Craig Brown / William Hasty6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKevin Martin / Bruce Pate vs Pierce Weatherly / Anthony Scafide7-5, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Men 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BBTC - Hutchinson 18 7.5 combo712228132
2Biloxi - McCarroll7119516157
3TOCC DAHL 183581635253
4BBTC-MATTHEWS 7.5 MEN2651939262
5OSTC - BYRD1761837256

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Duane Mcpeek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Doug Nash
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
A Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
William Troutman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Ron Carstens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Bruce Pate
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Reuben Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Terry Gene Cook
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Josh Martin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Klayton Pace
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lennon Rea
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Tony Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reuben Byrd + Terry Gene Cook2538% games+9.5% vs expected
William Troutman + Bruce Pate1452% games+0.9% vs expected
Lennon Rea + Reuben Byrd1436% gamesnot enough data
Ron Carstens + Terry Gene Cook033 matchesnot enough data
Reuben Byrd + Duane Mcpeek213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Duane Mcpeek
12W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Doug Nash
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
3.5
A Chapman
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Troutman
22W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
Ron Carstens
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Bruce Pate
9W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Reuben Byrd
30W–64L career · 6 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Terry Gene Cook
4W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
Josh Martin
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Klayton Pace
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lennon Rea
6W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tony Chapman
8W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.