Teams

LATA18/Henderson/LCC

2022 Tri-Level 18 & Over · Adult Women - 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Weekend

13 players · average NTRP 3.80 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Laura Plyler
published
4.23
Teri Grote
published
4.19
Kristin Estes
published
4.18
Ivana Gearheart
published 4.5
4.16
Marlene Robinson
published
3.99
Melissa Brightbill
published
3.94
Staci Jackson
published
3.54
Brittany Hickman
published 4
3.50
Randi Vogel
published
3.45
Farrah Schildknecht
published 3.5
3.26
Angie McCoy
published 3.5
3.24
Casie Henderson
published 3.5
Tina Akers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Akers + Ivana Gearheart6264% games+8.3% vs expected
Casie Henderson + Angie McCoy224 matchesnot enough data
Teri Grote + Melissa Brightbill213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Plyler
48W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
4.34
Teri Grote
42W–15L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
Kristin Estes
26W–12L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Ivana Gearheart
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
Marlene Robinson
22W–7L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
4.16
Melissa Brightbill
91W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.99
Staci Jackson
25W–17L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.94
4
Brittany Hickman
17W–18L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.54
Randi Vogel
46W–20L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Farrah Schildknecht
14W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Angie McCoy
29W–14L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Casie Henderson
31W–22L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Tina Akers
39W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.