Teams

DFIU

2025 18 & OVER MIXED DOUBLES · 7.0 FLIGHT

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-13vs AceholesLost 03
L#1 DoublesRaul Flores / Michele Brink vs Jeremy Bergeron / Katy Davis6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRoland Deleon / Sarah Naylor vs Charles Martin / Michelle Gonzalez6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFred Shumate / Jennifer Jones vs Jaden Martin / Lori Martin6-7, 1-6
2025-06-08vs 7.0 Squeegee SquadLost 03
L#1 DoublesRoland Deleon / Michele Brink vs Killian Corona / Lisa Wawrzyniak2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLeah Schlangen / Fred Shumate vs Marisa Sanchez / Jaime Medina3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAbby Holahan / Daniel Casanova vs Paula Gerloff / Matthew Vasquez6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 FLIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Michele Brink
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Leah Schlangen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Daniel Casanova
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.43
Fred Shumate
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Ernesto Elizondo
published
3.31
Roland Deleon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Sarah Naylor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Gretchen Brown
published
3.14
Nikita Ruparel
published
3.10
Abby Holahan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Abby Holahan + Daniel Casanova5160% gamesnot enough data
Roland Deleon + Michele Brink4162% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michele Brink
30W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Leah Schlangen
28W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Daniel Casanova
22W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Fred Shumate
46W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.43
Ernesto Elizondo
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Roland Deleon
31W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Sarah Naylor
27W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.27
Gretchen Brown
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
Nikita Ruparel
9W–15L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Abby Holahan
20W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.