Teams

Vaughan/Rive

2023 FW Tri-Level · Womens 3.5-4.0-4.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.92 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-11-12vs HalpernLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Kaytaz / Cindy Lucio vs Suzanne Ortolano / Amy Yeager1-6, 2-6
2023-11-11vs SingletonLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichelle Kaytaz / Jennifer McNamara vs Aya Singleton / Sasha Smith1-6, 2-6
2023-11-10vs AaronLost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Grimes / Michelle Kaytaz vs Kathyjoy Hammer / Patti Behar4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 3.5-4.0-4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Tamara Murer
published
4.29
Areli Martinez
published 4.5
3.84
Erin Aldrich
published 4
3.76
Bethany Vaughan
published 4
3.60
Bethany Factor
published 4
3.60
Jane Poquiz
published
3.52
Laura Hatton
published
3.49
Jennifer McNamara
published
3.49
Megan Bennett
published
3.46
Becky Connet
published 3.5
3.37
Michelle Kaytaz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Stacy Hamilton
published
3.11
Jennifer Palko
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tamara Murer
14W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
4.35
4.5
Areli Martinez
17W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
4.29
4
Erin Aldrich
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Bethany Vaughan
24W–28L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Bethany Factor
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
Jane Poquiz
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
Laura Hatton
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
Jennifer McNamara
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
Megan Bennett
47W–32L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Becky Connet
57W–39L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Michelle Kaytaz
127W–97L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
Stacy Hamilton
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.20
Jennifer Palko
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.