Teams

Bond, Adra

2023 Adult 18 & Over Summer 2.5W - 5.0 · 3.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-14vs Davenport, PhoebeWon 32
L#1 DoublesAiman Dvorak / Audra Dericotte vs Natalie Weber / Caitlin Tibbs7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAnna Gillispie vs Pam Dunaway6-1, 5-3
W#2 DoublesSonya Muller / Janet Gose vs Julianna Norgren / Morgan Moberg Moberg6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKristy Ecton vs Alvynne Villacampa6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAnnie Taylor / Alli Hiatt vs Diane Strahl / Laura Fosha6-4, 6-2
2023-06-07vs HOA/Vitha/18&Over3.5WLost 13
L#1 DoublesAnn Curtis / Amy Benson vs Carol Smith / Dawn Vitha3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAnna Gillispie vs Jennifer Schreiber6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJanet Gose / Sonya Muller vs Jennifer Carlisle / Christy Saxer4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTanya Rodecker Wendt / Adra Bond vs Caitlyn White / Sheila Mccarrick0-6, 0-6
2023-05-31vs Bennett, ConnieLost 23
L#1 DoublesAnn Curtis / Tanya Rodecker Wendt vs Susan Murphy / Nancy Kitts3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristy Ecton vs Paula Spielhagen1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAiman Dvorak / Audra Dericotte vs Rhonda Gilstrap / Beth Mundhenke6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAnna Gillispie vs Sheila Goins7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMaria Andrew / Alli Hiatt vs Natalie Neal / Karen Rogers2-6, 0-6
2023-05-24vs Edwards, AliceLost 13
L#1 DoublesAnnie Taylor / Tanya Rodecker Wendt vs Marla Lovinggood / MaryAnn Luchtel1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnna Gillispie vs Stacie Temple6-3, 5-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAdra Bond / Lindsay Vise vs Susan Geick / Kathy Goggin1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAudra Dericotte / Ashley Lorei vs Jody McClain / Keely Schneider6-2, 6-3
2023-05-17vs Nguyen, ThuWon 31
L#1 DoublesSharon Molloy / Nancy Huddlestun vs Kelly Nulan / Tasha Kosanke7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAnna Gillispie vs Debbie Fay6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSonya Muller / Aiman Dvorak vs Ali Loyd / Thu Nguyen5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAudra Dericotte / Alli Hiatt vs Naomi Tucker / Brigid Culey6-2, 7-5
2023-05-10vs Hotze, EileenLost 14
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Chilcote / Sharon Molloy vs Kim Wade / Jessica Menghini2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAnn Curtis vs Melissa Beltrame1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Andrew / Nancy Huddlestun vs Eileen Hotze / Katie Trenkle1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAnna Gillispie vs Lori Blinn2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAdra Bond / Lindsay Vise vs Betsy Graverson / Jenifer Muir0-6, 1-6
2023-05-03vs Nelson, CydneyLost 04
L#1 DoublesAshley Lorei / Audra Dericotte vs Nicole Satterwhite / Brenda Moore2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAnna Gillispie vs Lindsey Horner5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Chilcote / Annie Taylor vs Marjorie Jones / Lisa Stillman7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaria Andrew / Tanya Rodecker Wendt vs Kathy Hawley / Kim Chappelow-Lee6-7, 1-6
2023-04-26vs Kochersperger, CindyWon 32
L#1 DoublesAnnie Taylor / Alli Hiatt vs Polina Shaposhnyk / Anna McCune2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesAnn Curtis vs Nancy MacK7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSonya Muller / Janet Gose vs Cindy Kochersperger / Janet Crawford6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKristy Ecton vs Katie Chaplin6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAdra Bond / Amy Benson vs Beth Strader / Stacy Beshears2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOAWC/Lyon/18&Over3.5W81311433321
2Meigs, Barbara81301536348
3Snyder, Karen72311433315
4Nelson, Cydney62281227285
5HOA/Vitha/18&Over3.5W62271331287
6Hotze, Eileen62241636305
7Peixoto, Summer63291638327
8Bennett, Connie53221844322
9Groves, Mary54271840329
10Edwards, Alice44241642327
11Nguyen, Thu44192151391
12Brocker, Kerri45192657410
13Bond, Adra35142654406
14Paul, Jayme36222353417
15Cappuzzo, Gina36162963441
16Sanders, Kimberly18133272469
17Kochersperger, Cindy0883267427
18Evans, Karen0973875489

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Audra Dericotte
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.57
Ashley Lorei
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.47
Lindsay Vise
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Annie Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Aiman Dvorak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Ann Curtis
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.29
Anna Gillispie
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
Amy Benson
published 3.5
3.23
Elizabeth Chilcote
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Maria Andrew
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Tanya Rodecker Wendt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Sonya Muller
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.83
Alli Hiatt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.81
Nancy Huddlestun
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Adra Bond
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.72
Kristy Ecton
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Janet Gose
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Molloy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Gose + Sonya Muller4154% games+13.4% vs expected
Audra Dericotte + Aiman Dvorak3357% games+12.6% vs expected
Ashley Lorei + Audra Dericotte3353% games+11.6% vs expected
Ashley Lorei + Lindsay Vise14953% games+2.3% vs expected
Audra Dericotte + Lindsay Vise2440% games−6.8% vs expected
Aiman Dvorak + Lindsay Vise303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Audra Dericotte
73W–66L career · 8 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Ashley Lorei
51W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.57
Lindsay Vise
38W–59L career · 2 lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Annie Taylor
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Aiman Dvorak
42W–35L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Ann Curtis
40W–54L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Anna Gillispie
17W–10L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Amy Benson
no matches on record · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Chilcote
4W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Maria Andrew
74W–45L career · 6 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Tanya Rodecker Wendt
5W–17L career · 4 lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.11
Sonya Muller
74W–94L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Alli Hiatt
63W–84L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
Nancy Huddlestun
36W–33L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Adra Bond
8W–11L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristy Ecton
8W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
2.72
Janet Gose
50W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharon Molloy
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.