← Teams

THPRD-Chin

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 4.39 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Sage Katayama
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.33
Paige Polizois
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
—
Alexandra van Hoy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.14
Bao Bui
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.97
Franklin Truong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.92
Gregg Palmer
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.91
Kimberly Quach
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.86
Joshua Goddard
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.80
Zach Bergthold
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Results8 ties
2021-12-05Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesSage Katayama / Terra Yara vs Chris Collins / Kayleigh Tanca4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoshua Goddard / Kimberly Quach vs Jack Wang / Amanda Solomon6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesZach Bergthold / Alyssa Byde vs Stefan Lagielski / Kaytlynn Kolb6-0, 6-2
2021-11-21Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesSage Katayama / Terra Yara vs James Fenner / Leslie Ballard4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesZach Bergthold / Paige Polizois vs Peter Brown / Timora Konigwilcox6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesFranklin Truong / Kimberly Quach vs David Boyer / Maddie Karpinski7-6, 6-4
2021-11-13Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesBao Bui / MacKenzie Hotan vs Mauricio Castro / Cathrine Olander7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAlexandra van Hoy / Franklin Truong vs Kirsten Ruchaber / Frank Collie6-3, 6-3
2021-11-07Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJoshua Goddard / Paige Polizois vs Eric Furuya / Bo Yu6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSage Katayama / Alexandra van Hoy vs Daniel Yoo / Tamara Justus6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesZach Bergthold / Alyssa Byde vs Colin Arnold / Sydney Taggart6-2, 6-0
2021-10-30Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesPaige Polizois / Gregg Palmer vs Benjamin Yang / Annie Duong2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRyan Chin / Alexandra van Hoy vs Elise Orban / Carson Hall6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAlyssa Byde / Bao Bui vs Stephanie Leeding / Bo Johnson6-0, 6-2
2021-10-09Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesFranklin Truong / Alexandra van Hoy vs Wakana Turner / Atom Fjeldsted6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSage Katayama / Kimberly Quach vs Kirsten Ruchaber / Marc Greenberg6-2, 6-3
2021-09-25Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRyan Chin / Alexandra van Hoy vs Ry Koteen / Tiare Farris6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoshua Goddard / MacKenzie Hotan vs James Fenner / Elise Anderson6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGregg Palmer / Paige Polizois vs Brian Hendrickson / Maddie Karpinski6-2, 6-4
2021-09-19Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesBao Bui / MacKenzie Hotan vs Toby Krauel / Lisa Provost6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesFranklin Truong / Alexandra van Hoy vs Quang Pham / Susan Ford6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGregg Palmer / Alyssa Byde vs Matthew Condit / Nilsa Zeman6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Sage Katayama
58W–24L career
0%33%67%
4.59
4.5
Paige Polizois
61W–38L career
0%95%5%
4.33
4.5
Alexandra van Hoy
72W–56L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Bao Bui
38W–42L career
2%98%0%
4.14
4.5
Franklin Truong
30W–52L career
25%75%0%
3.97
4
Gregg Palmer
182W–77L career
0%94%6%
3.92
4.5
Kimberly Quach
110W–96L career
36%64%0%
3.91
4.5
Joshua Goddard
74W–48L career
52%48%0%
3.86
4
Zach Bergthold
40W–47L career
0%98%1%
3.80

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.