Teams

SD LLW 9.0 Peninsula TC/ Simmons

2024 Mixed Doubles 40 & Over Summer- SD · SD

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-03vs SDNC 9.0 Carmel Valley/ KubaWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlison Hagopian / Jeff Ray vs Alex Levie / Richette Lock6-2, 6-1
2024-07-13vs SDNC 9.0 Carmel Valley/ KubaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJeff Ray / Ana Seelinger vs David de Sure / Adele Psyllos6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJohn Simmons / Alison Hagopian vs John Weiss / Richette Lock6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2024-06-29vs SDNC 9.0 Carmel Valley/ KubaWon 10
W#2 DoublesAna Seelinger / Will Garber vs Robyn K F Leong / John Weiss6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAna Seelinger / Will Garber vs Bethann Barry / Scott Atwood6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAlison Hagopian / John Simmons vs Ashley Stone / Peter Harris6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.33 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Priscilla Martinez
published
4.52
Ana Seelinger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.42
Allison Sterett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.40
Tiffany Kellogg
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.36
Alison Hagopian
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.35
James Kellogg
published 4.5
4.35
Eric Alm
published 4.5
4.29
Stuart Ridge
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.27
Will Garber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Andrew MacFarlane
published 4.5
3.87
Jed Galan
published 4
Jeff Ray
published
Jonathan Coyle
published
Sheila Rao
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Will Garber + Ana Seelinger6169% gamesnot enough data
Tiffany Kellogg + James Kellogg303 matchesnot enough data
Andrew MacFarlane + Allison Sterett303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Priscilla Martinez
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.58
5
Ana Seelinger
186W–59L career · 3 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
4.52
4.5
Allison Sterett
123W–62L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Tiffany Kellogg
163W–91L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
4.40
4.5
Alison Hagopian
171W–74L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
4.36
4.5
James Kellogg
13W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
Eric Alm
59W–54L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
Stuart Ridge
108W–64L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Will Garber
93W–52L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Andrew MacFarlane
13W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.24
4
Jed Galan
161W–84L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
3.87
Jeff Ray
20W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jonathan Coyle
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sheila Rao
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.