Teams

RDowling-HR

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Men Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-24vs VVerdier-DURSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAndrew Curso vs Eric Langhans7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesRory Dowling vs Justin Kretzschmar6-0, 6-2
2026-06-23vs JByrd-NCCULost 12
L#1 SinglesThomas Johnston vs Jameson Blount4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesSam Berger vs Matthew Curry3-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesRory Dowling vs Casey Collins5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-06-03vs JPobst-DURLost 12
L#1 SinglesThomas Johnston vs Joseph Davis6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAaron Lubeck vs Kevin Lloyd2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesRory Dowling vs Jackson Freeman6-3, 6-2
2026-05-27vs JMontague-DURWon 21
L#1 SinglesRory Dowling vs Conor Kregecz3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesMark Fossum vs JAMES MONTAGUE7-5, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAndrew Nelsen vs John Chiles6-4, 6-3
2026-05-20vs DWork-SVCWon 21
W#1 SinglesRory Dowling vs William Eubanks6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesAndrew Curso vs Duncan Work6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesSam Berger vs Chris Moffitt6-7, 3-6
2026-05-13vs EChen-UNCLost 12
L#1 SinglesThomas Johnston vs Eric Shen3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesRory Dowling vs Eric Chen6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesSam Berger vs Stuart Beeson7-5, 2-5
2026-05-06vs TKharva-DURLost 12
L#1 SinglesAaron Lubeck vs Ryan Curet6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSam Berger vs Tejas Kharva3-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesAndrew Curso vs Benjamin Kairys7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Aaron Lubeck
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Rory Dowling
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.26
Andrew Curso
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Thomas Johnston
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.17
Andrew Nelsen
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
3.09
Mark Fossum
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.97
Sam Berger
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Curso + Aaron Lubeck213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Aaron Lubeck
18W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.54
Rory Dowling
17W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Andrew Curso
39W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Thomas Johnston
7W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Andrew Nelsen
19W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
Mark Fossum
25W–12L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
Sam Berger
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.