Teams

Mixed Not Stirred

2026 18 & OVER MIXED DOUBLES · 7.0 FLIGHT

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-19vs Double Fault Divas & DaddiesLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobin Kozub / Mike Kozub vs Chelsea Cantu / David Perales7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Horne / Stephen Dennis vs Rana Obayes / Hiram Chavez2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAngela Sandidge / Matthew Sandidge vs Kirsten Mattingly / Roque Juarez7-6, 6-2
2026-07-12vs DFIULost 03
L#1 DoublesBrian Kurth / Kelly Horne vs Michele Brink / Raul Flores5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Hankins / Brad Vogt vs Ryan McLaughlin / Amanda Mays6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesYvonne Uhl / Gary Uhl vs Abby Holahan / Daniel Casanova1-6, 1-6
2026-06-28vs Serves You RightWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrian Kurth / Stephanie Hankins vs Mary Cirilo / Jeff Henkes5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMike Kozub / Robin Kozub vs Alison Dearden / Raul Hernandez4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJamie Shomette / Kevin Shomette vs Ariel Canonizado / Tina OBryan6-4, 6-0
2026-06-21vs JNCC Dare DoublesWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobin Kozub / Mike Kozub vs Fiona Payton / Stephen Lyssy6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStephanie Hankins / Brian Kurth vs Phillip Fields / Teresa Mirarchi6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGary Uhl / Yvonne Uhl vs Lidiane Bridges / Vaughn Bridges3-6, 1-6
2026-06-07vs Sonterra SelectLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephen Dennis / Yvonne Uhl vs Charles Martin / Jordan Funk1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Sandidge / Angela Sandidge vs Stephen Galvan / Lori Martin3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Haines / Jen Haines vs Orlando Villegas / Chloe Martin1-6, 6-7
2026-06-02vs JCC V RangersLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndy Donoso / Stephanie Hankins vs Chris Lowry / Carmen Ahmed4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Sandidge / Angela Sandidge vs Satchie Seidlits / Lee Seidlits4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJamie Shomette / Gary Uhl vs Saurabh Gupta / Sarah Scoggin0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.0 FLIGHT
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1JCC V Rangers3311716146
2Double Fault Divas & Daddies339921165
3JNCC Dare Doubles339922165
4Mixed Not Stirred2451329198
5Serves You Right0641429195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Andy Donoso
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Jamie Shomette
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.71
Jen Haines
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Matthew Sandidge
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Bettina Walker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.37
Kevin Shomette
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Yvonne Uhl
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Robin Kozub
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Brian Kurth
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Stephen Dennis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Kelly Horne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Brad Vogt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Mike Kozub
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Stephanie Hankins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Brian Haines
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Angela Sandidge
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Shomette + Andy Donoso3453% games+4.5% vs expected
Matthew Sandidge + Angela Sandidge2739% games−7.3% vs expected
Kelly Horne + Brian Kurth314 matchesnot enough data
Robin Kozub + Mike Kozub123 matchesnot enough data
Jamie Shomette + Brian Kurth303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andy Donoso
12W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.87
Jamie Shomette
26W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Jen Haines
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Matthew Sandidge
16W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.69
4
Bettina Walker
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.46
Kevin Shomette
13W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
Yvonne Uhl
30W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.36
Robin Kozub
19W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Brian Kurth
20W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Stephen Dennis
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
Kelly Horne
37W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Brad Vogt
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mike Kozub
11W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Stephanie Hankins
59W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Brian Haines
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Angela Sandidge
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.