Teams

Midtown/Rhett

2024 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Spring Day · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.75 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-19vs Winner/Midtown/ChrzanWon 10
W#2 DoublesRosane Villordo / Claudia Low vs Lorena Esclair / Tiffany Spence6-4, 6-2
2024-06-17vs Winner/Midtown/ChrzanWon 10
W#1 DoublesPatricia Ballesteros / ROMINA CARENA vs Asel Kamilova / Vanessa Silva6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-06-03vs Winner/Midtown/ChrzanLost 01
L#2 DoublesClaudia Low / Adriana Perez vs Vanessa Silva / Valeria Penjasoff1-6, 0-6
2024-05-20vs Winner/Midtown/ChrzanWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Rhett / ROMINA CARENA vs Lorena Esclair / Valeria Penjasoff7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2024-04-29vs Winner/Midtown/ChrzanLost 01
L#2 DoublesClaudia Low / Tania Marin vs Asel Kamilova / Lorena Esclair0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.39 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Rosane Villordo
published
2.84
2.76
Tania Kiger
published
2.65
ROMINA CARENA
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.35
2.30
Alicia Alvarez
published 3
2.25
Claudia Low
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.16
Adriana Perez
published 2.5
2.14
Alejandra Jaramillo
published 2.5
2.12
Kim Oppenheimer
published
1.90
Fernanda Hirsch
published
Jennifer Rhett
published
Tania Marin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adriana Perez + Alejandra Jaramillo6256% games+3.2% vs expected
Mariana Nascimento + ROMINA CARENA4746% games+0.8% vs expected
Tania Kiger + Alicia Alvarez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rosane Villordo
19W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Mariana Nascimento
43W–26L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
Tania Kiger
10W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
3
ROMINA CARENA
28W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
Patricia Ballesteros
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%86%14%
2.35
3
Alicia Alvarez
9W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
2.30
2.5
Claudia Low
24W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Adriana Perez
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.16
2.5
Alejandra Jaramillo
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.14
Kim Oppenheimer
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Fernanda Hirsch
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Jennifer Rhett
8W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tania Marin
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.