Teams

CM BLUE

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT

10 players · average NTRP 4.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-05vs CP GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDanny Bartell / David Biermann vs James Elsworth / David Barry3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPaul Wrona / Craig Stromberg vs John Greves / Robert Wilson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-08-29vs GPTC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Cox / David Biermann vs Woonghee Lee / Brian Brillantes7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-22vs CACM GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesTyler Coyle / David Biermann vs Ben Atlee / Miles Doane6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2023-08-15vs DTC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Wrona / Tyler Coyle vs Kenneth McDonald / Paul Robbertz4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-08-01vs CP SILVERWon 10
W#2 DoublesPaul Wrona / Tyler Coyle vs Wayne Mitchel / Davis Fleming6-1, 6-3
2023-07-25vs WP BLACKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPaul Wrona / Caleb Ray vs Evan Wehmeyer / Luke Paulo6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDouglas Sparks / Craig Stromberg vs Jace Monroe / Matt Anderson3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
David Biermann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.42
Tyler Coyle
published
4.37
Sumant Bhat
published
4.35
Paul Wrona
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.33
Caleb Ray
published 4.5
4.08
Danny Bartell
published 4.5
3.85
Craig Stromberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Douglas Sparks
published
Don Parsons
published
Matt Mcconaty
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Don Parsons + Douglas Sparks1544% games−2.0% vs expected
Tyler Coyle + Caleb Ray213 matchesnot enough data
Sumant Bhat + David Biermann213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Biermann
63W–21L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
4.43
Tyler Coyle
21W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
4.42
Sumant Bhat
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Paul Wrona
59W–39L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
4.35
4.5
Caleb Ray
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Danny Bartell
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Craig Stromberg
87W–60L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.85
Douglas Sparks
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Don Parsons
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Matt Mcconaty
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.