Teams

Racfitters

Winter Adult 55 & Over Doubles · Mens 9.0 55

13 players · average NTRP 4.33 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-11vs Westwood 9.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesRick Garza / Clay Johnson vs John Whelan / Fred Cohagan7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Hernandez / Kevin Lemke vs Tim Klitch / Fred Kennedy6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Lane / Brad van Winkle vs Chris Wallin / Berkley Simmons3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-04-04vs Old SchoolLost 03
L#1 DoublesRick Garza / Clay Johnson vs Juan Dekruyff / Lee Moroz3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrad van Winkle / Michael Lane vs Scott Logeman / Peter Markes4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKarl Lambert / Douglas Anderson vs Agustin Mena / Charles Ballard4-4
2026-03-28vs Westwood 9.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJeff Abshire / David Luedtke vs Burke Banda / John Whelan0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Reiter / Kevin Lemke vs Michael Chibib / Tim Klitch6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKarl Lambert / Gregory Hensley vs Chris Wallin / Berkley Simmons3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-14vs Old SchoolLost 12
L#1 DoublesDouglas Anderson / Rick Garza vs Juan Dekruyff / Lee Moroz3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Abshire / David Luedtke vs Peter Markes / Scott Logeman6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKarl Lambert / Gregory Hensley vs Oscar Martinez / Matt Pyle6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-02-21vs Old SchoolWon 21
W#1 DoublesClay Johnson / Rick Garza vs Peter Markes / Scott Logeman6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJeff Abshire / David Luedtke vs Juan Dekruyff / Lee Moroz1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Hernandez / Kevin Lemke vs Oscar Martinez / Anthony Tatu7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Mens 9.0 55
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Racfitters2351022160
2Westwood 9.01441125166

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Clay Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Karl Lambert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.18
Rick Garza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
John Hernandez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.12
David Luedtke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Kevin Lemke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.04
Gregory Hensley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Brad van Winkle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
David Reiter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Douglas Anderson
published
Jeff Abshire
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Friedman
published
Michael Lane
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gregory Hensley + Karl Lambert3347% games−10.1% vs expected
David Luedtke + Jeff Abshire033 matchesnot enough data
Rick Garza + Clay Johnson213 matchesnot enough data
Douglas Anderson + John Hernandez033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Clay Johnson
10W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
Karl Lambert
23W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
4.26
Rick Garza
5W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
4.18
John Hernandez
28W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
David Luedtke
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
4.12
Kevin Lemke
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
4.08
Gregory Hensley
37W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
4.04
4
Brad van Winkle
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.91
David Reiter
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Douglas Anderson
8W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeff Abshire
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Friedman
30W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Lane
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.