Teams

NE/Jensen/Tri3.0-4.0M

2025 Neb. Adult 18&Over Tri-Level · 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-29vs MandigoWon 21
W#1 DoublesSri Vijay Yellepeddi / James Farley vs Trae Andrews / Will Fleig6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Katt / Scott Lilleskov vs Myles Jasnowski / JP Jamison6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAdam Gouttierre / Ross Jensen vs Jackson Figard / John Miller3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-09-23vs EkWon 21
W#1 DoublesAaron Jank / Douglas Stuva vs Drew Fossler / Seth Kingery7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesScott Lilleskov / Andy Wang vs Kreg Green / Jackson Schwanebeck4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJames Farley / Sri Vijay Yellepeddi vs Andrew Ek / Daniel Weyer6-4, 6-3
2025-09-17vs MoguelWon 30
W#1 DoublesAaron Jank / Douglas Stuva vs Jacob Tegler / Brian Vuu6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDale Dixon / Ying Zhang vs Ethan Christensen / Justin Gibson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJames Farley / Sri Vijay Yellepeddi vs Bruno Garcia / Jeff Shield7-5, 6-1
2025-09-15vs HansenWon 30
W#1 DoublesRoss Jensen / Adam Gouttierre vs Will Nguyen / Loc Le7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesScott Lilleskov / Andy Wang vs Bryce Hansen / Emir Plicanic6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJayden Kephart / Sri Vijay Yellepeddi vs Alan Givens / Dan Inman6-0, 6-0
2025-09-10vs MandigoWon 21
L#1 DoublesRoss Jensen / Adam Gouttierre vs John Miller / Jackson Figard3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Katt / Scott Lilleskov vs Kevin Mandigo / JP Jamison6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJeff VanRoy / Sri Vijay Yellepeddi vs Will Fleig / Travis Figard6-0, 6-1
2025-08-25vs EkWon 30
W#1 DoublesAaron Jank / Douglas Stuva vs Seth Kingery / Spencer Elliott6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Katt / Ying Zhang vs Kreg Green / Rodney Ware6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJames Farley / Jayden Kephart vs Andrew Ek / Garrett Anstreicher6-0, 6-3
2025-08-18vs MoguelWon 30
W#1 DoublesDouglas Stuva / Aaron Jank vs Caleb Nielsen / Brian Vuu6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDale Dixon / Ying Zhang vs Pablo Moguel / Ethan Christensen6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJeff VanRoy / Jayden Kephart vs Brent Korte / Jeff Shield6-2, 6-1
2025-08-11vs HansenWon 30
W#1 DoublesRoss Jensen / Adam Gouttierre vs Will Nguyen / Loc Le3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDale Dixon / Benjamin Katt vs Emir Plicanic / Kaveh Shamloo6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJeff VanRoy / James Farley vs John Klotz / Dan Inman6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NE/Jensen/Tri3.0-4.0M802137135
2Ek6218614145
3Moguel2691534239
4Hansen2642040260

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Aaron Jank
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.73
Adam Gouttierre
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Ross Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Scott Lilleskov
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Dale Dixon
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.48
Jeff VanRoy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Benjamin Katt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Douglas Stuva
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Andy Wang
published 3.5
3.23
James Farley
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.19
Jayden Kephart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Sri Vijay Yellepeddi
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Ying Zhang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Gouttierre + Ross Jensen15459% games+2.4% vs expected
Aaron Jank + Douglas Stuva12555% games+0.7% vs expected
Douglas Stuva + Adam Gouttierre224 matchesnot enough data
Scott Lilleskov + Dale Dixon303 matchesnot enough data
James Farley + Sri Vijay Yellepeddi303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aaron Jank
69W–31L career · 8 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
4.01
4
Adam Gouttierre
77W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Ross Jensen
103W–71L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
Scott Lilleskov
58W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.59
3.5
Dale Dixon
73W–46L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.56
Jeff VanRoy
33W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
4
Benjamin Katt
46W–18L career · 8 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Douglas Stuva
88W–43L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
3.5
Andy Wang
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
James Farley
16W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Jayden Kephart
20W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Sri Vijay Yellepeddi
21W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Ying Zhang
16W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.