Teams

IRMSL/Borchers

2026 IRMSL Adult 40 & Over WINTER · 3.5 Women-Sun

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-03-15vs VCT/GoldLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarol Kushner / Christie Mayer vs Cynthia Croom / Brenda Anderson Newhof3-6, 3-6
2026-02-08vs VCT/GoldWon 10
W#2 DoublesLindsay Morales / Carol Kushner vs Andrea Geldres / Pia Gold7-5, 6-3
2026-01-11vs VCT/GoldLost 01
L#2 DoublesCynthia Wicker / Carol Kushner vs Eliot Foote / Susan Hofstetter4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women-Sun have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Tillie Borchers
published
3.49
Darla Cederberg
published 3.5
3.42
Kathy Goers
published
3.36
Carol Kushner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Lindsay Morales
published
3.29
3.23
Christie Mayer
published 3.5
3.14
Brooke Brooks
published 3.5
3.03
Cynthia Wicker
published 3.5
2.84
Zaida Quesada
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jessica Tornese
published
Karianne Lange
published
Tara Feddon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christie Mayer + Brooke Brooks1437% games−7.0% vs expected
Lindsay Morales + Brooke Brooks4158% gamesnot enough data
Brooke Brooks + Jessica Tornese404 matchesnot enough data
Brooke Brooks + Tillie Borchers213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tillie Borchers
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.58
3.5
Darla Cederberg
4W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
Kathy Goers
8W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Carol Kushner
44W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
Lindsay Morales
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
Richellene Bonaccorso
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Christie Mayer
6W–8L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Brooke Brooks
14W–9L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Cynthia Wicker
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03
Zaida Quesada
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Jessica Tornese
16W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Karianne Lange
12W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tara Feddon
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.