Teams

SD 3.5 Coronado TC/ Lesh

2023 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE Women · SD- Women- WE 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-25vs SD LLW 3.5 SDTRC /KauffmanSplit 11
W#1 SinglesYvonne Bentle vs Elyse Wurster6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Dahlgren / Rita Steel vs Kim Schwab / Kelly Wilson2-6, 0-6
2023-06-04vs SD 3.5 Mtn View/ HernandezWon 20
W#1 DoublesCaree Lesh / Nabeelah Khan vs Cheryle Pillow / Elizabeth Ponce6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Dahlgren / Jennifer Neivert vs TOMOKO BALKO / Viviana Rozo7-5, 6-3
2023-05-07vs SD 3.5 Mtn View/ PadillaLost 01
L#2 DoublesCyndi Smith / Elizabeth Dahlgren vs Evelyn Irving / Frances Simpson Lang4-6, 4-6
2023-04-30Won 10
W#1 SinglesYvonne Bentle vs TOMOKO BALKO7-6, 6-3
2023-04-23vs SD 3.5 Peninsula TC/ BarnettLost 01
L#2 DoublesRita Steel / Elizabeth Dahlgren vs Zahira Vargas / Lorena Whiteside5-7, 4-6
2023-04-16vs SD 3.5 SDTRC/ MonzonSplit 11
W#1 SinglesYvonne Bentle vs Amy Hamric6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCyndi Smith / Caree Lesh vs Alisa Le / Lisa Shirley3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD- Women- WE 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Julia Gidovlenko
published
3.61
Yvonne Hwang
published
3.37
Elizabeth Dahlgren
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Yvonne Bentle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Connie Kocherga
published 3.5
3.10
Caree Lesh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Jennifer Vernallis
published
3.07
Nabeelah Khan
published
3.03
Ana Chapman
published 3.5
2.94
Samantha Nelson
published
2.83
Jennifer Neivert
published
2.64
Michelle Gilmore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caree Lesh + Elizabeth Dahlgren9453% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Gidovlenko
66W–14L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
Yvonne Hwang
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
22%77%<1%
3.61
3.5
Elizabeth Dahlgren
85W–80L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Yvonne Bentle
80W–71L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Connie Kocherga
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Caree Lesh
29W–42L career · 2 lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.10
Jennifer Vernallis
1W–10L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Nabeelah Khan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.07
3.5
Ana Chapman
11W–29L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
Samantha Nelson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.94
Jennifer Neivert
9W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Michelle Gilmore
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.