Teams

horowitz - BCC Aces

2025 Montgomery Doubles Summer Women · Montgomery Doubles Summer 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-08vs Curran - WGCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesSherry Altman / Kirsten Propst vs Odette Clark Campbell / Shannon Haynes0-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesE Molly Hemsley / Kim Rehmann vs Kathleen Ricchetti / Allison Zidlicky2-6, 2-6
2025-08-27vs Psacharopoulos - Congressional 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMonica Brenneman / Audrey Yen vs Missi Dye / Erika Psacharopoulos1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesMonica Brenneman / Kim Rehmann vs Biby Salcedo / Meghan Smith6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesKathi Teitelbaum / Monica Brenneman vs Lisa Kanter / Lori Clogg3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-14vs Yuan - Power SmashWon 10
W#3 DoublesE Molly Hemsley / Monica Brenneman vs Anto Faini / Katherine Fluharty6-7, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Doubles Summer 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Sherry Altman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Kathi Teitelbaum
published
3.60
Kirsten Propst
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Lisa Davison
published
3.54
Kim Rehmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Monica Brenneman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Audrey Yen
published 3.5
3.25
Patricia Rose
published
3.18
Sandy Horowitz
published
3.12
Li Ives
published
3.08
Jill Granader
published
E Molly Hemsley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Melanie Wine
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sherry Altman
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Kathi Teitelbaum
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Kirsten Propst
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.60
Lisa Davison
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Kim Rehmann
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
Monica Brenneman
46W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Audrey Yen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Rose
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Sandy Horowitz
13W–20L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Li Ives
12W–34L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Jill Granader
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
E Molly Hemsley
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Melanie Wine
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.