Teams

BP - Caldwell

2025 · 2026 SATA USTA Adult 18 & Over (Men) - Fall

13 players · average NTRP 3.30 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-20Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGregg Johnson / Albert Colmenares vs Isaac Stewart / Justin Owen4-6, 1-6
2025-10-02vs SCC - Frischer/SinoffWon 10
W#2 SinglesJames Bott vs Kevin Richmond6-3, 7-5
2025-09-11Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJames Bott vs John Austin0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 SATA USTA Adult 18 & Over (Men) - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Chris Beecher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
James Dodson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
James Bott
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.37
Chad Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.30
Sean Caldwell
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.28
Mike Correal
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Fabio Gobette Lopes
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.21
Edward Kowalewski
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.07
Andre Niederberger
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.06
Jeremiah Gastin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
2.81
Ali Shojaee Bakhtiari
usually #1 Singles 58%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.72
Albert Colmenares
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gregg Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Beecher + James Dodson4160% gamesnot enough data
Sean Caldwell + Fabio Gobette Lopes314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Beecher
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
James Dodson
25W–31L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
James Bott
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Chad Brooks
14W–14L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
Sean Caldwell
7W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
Mike Correal
6W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Fabio Gobette Lopes
9W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
Edward Kowalewski
12W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Andre Niederberger
10W–22L career · 14 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Jeremiah Gastin
29W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Ali Shojaee Bakhtiari
18W–32L career · 12 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Albert Colmenares
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%2%
2.72
Gregg Johnson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.