Teams

RUTHless Racquets 3.0

2025 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over · Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.08 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesTom Erdely / Peter Tice vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-21vs Tyler 3.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesShashank Bhatia / Andrew Lutas vs Woo Jin Shim / Rudolph Isaac4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJason Levit / Daniel Volker vs Wei Fu / KC Song1-6, 0-6
2025-06-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesPeter Tice / ALAN EMBRY vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-21vs Tyler 3.0Lost 13
L#1 DoublesDaniel Volker / Greg Singh vs Tim McNamara / Danny Hall2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMilad Ebrahimi vs Ray Krickel5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesVenkat Reddy / Shashank Bhatia vs Eddie Gao / Kevin Ro7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAndy Brill / Jason Levit vs Rudolph Isaac / Woo Jin Shim3-6, 2-6
2025-04-16vs Tyler 3.0Lost 14
L#1 DoublesAndrew Lutas / Greg Singh vs Danny Hall / KC Song2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesTom Erdely vs Ray Krickel7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMilad Ebrahimi / Shashank Bhatia vs Bo Liang / Kevin Ro3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesALAN EMBRY vs Jon Anders1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJason Levit / Andy Brill vs Tim McNamara / Hyun Soo Kim2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
3.12
Tom Erdely
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.10
Greg Singh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Andrew Lutas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Daniel Volker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Milad Ebrahimi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
ALAN EMBRY
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.63
Peter Tice
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.45
Andy Brill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jason Levit
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Shashank Bhatia
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Venkat Reddy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ruth Go Fernando Randle
21W–18L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Tom Erdely
27W–57L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Greg Singh
14W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.10
3
Andrew Lutas
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Daniel Volker
16W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
Milad Ebrahimi
10W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
3
ALAN EMBRY
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Peter Tice
45W–74L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
2.63
3
Andy Brill
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
Jason Levit
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shashank Bhatia
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Venkat Reddy
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.