Teams

Powell-CC

2026 CORTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Fall · Women 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-12-17vs Cargill-GIWon 21
W#1 DoublesCalina Creech / Helen Powell vs Kecia Cawthorne / Leigh Kosobucki7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLaurie Hice / Diana Newman vs Amanda Hawkins / Shirley Cargill6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLisa Presley / Niki Gedroic vs Michele Chulick / Aminta Flowers6-3
2025-12-16vs Fuller/Thomas-CCWon 20
W#2 DoublesTracie Fitzgerald / Suzanne Kraus vs Deidre Hinson / Brenda Kosobucki7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLaurie Hice / Calina Creech vs Kristi Scott / Melanie Gowens6-4, 6-3
2025-12-14vs Fuller/Thomas-CCWon 21
W#1 DoublesCalina Creech / Diana Newman vs Melanie Gowens / Jennifer Stephens6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Kraus / Robin King vs Beth Bastien / Patricia Spenard2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesTracie Fitzgerald / Tammy Briggs vs Mary Daniel / Deidre Hinson6-0, 6-2
2025-12-09vs Kelley-CCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCalina Creech / Helen Powell vs Vicki Carde / Darlene Graham4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesNiki Gedroic / Diana Newman vs JoAnn Chhokar / Robin Sands6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Kraus / Debbie Harris vs Pat Kelley / Andrea Walden2-6, 1-6
2025-11-23vs Kelley-CCLost 12
L#1 DoublesNiki Gedroic / Tammy Briggs vs Darlene Graham / Vicki Carde3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSusan Corpus / Debbie Harris vs Janet Hart / Gloria Shayne3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDiana Newman / Laurie Hice vs Donna Davis / Robin Sands6-2, 6-0
2025-11-18vs Cargill-GILost 12
W#1 DoublesCalina Creech / Diana Newman vs Amanda Hawkins / Shirley Cargill6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNiki Gedroic / Robin King vs Kay Gantt / Elaine Laughbaum4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Harris / Suzanne Kraus vs Deirdre Howard / Leigh Kosobucki1-6, 3-6
2025-11-16vs Fuller/Thomas-CCWon 30
W#1 DoublesClaire Fairchild / Helen Powell vs Jean Fuller / Patricia Spenard6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCalina Creech / Diana Newman vs Erin Bouthillier / Jennifer Stephens6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDebbie Harris / Suzanne Kraus vs Barrett Dozier / Brenda Kosobucki6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2025-11-14vs Kelley-CCWon 21
W#1 DoublesNiki Gedroic / Lisa Presley vs Vicki Carde / Diane Bush7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaurie Hice / Claire Fairchild vs Andrea Walden / Jessica Livingston6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTammy Briggs / Susan Corpus vs Pat Kelley / Gloria Shayne4-6, 2-6
2025-11-01vs Cargill-GILost 02
L#1 DoublesRobin King / Calina Creech vs Shirley Cargill / Amanda Hawkins6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTracie Fitzgerald / Karen Griffin vs Barbara Harrell / Kecia Cawthorne2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cargill-GI63171024213
2Powell-CC54161123217
3Fuller/Thomas-CC0942349297

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Calina Creech
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.77
Claire Fairchild
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Laurie Hice
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.62
Niki Gedroic
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.61
Susan Corpus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Robin King
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.57
Tammy Briggs
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.44
Tracie Fitzgerald
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.34
Suzanne Kraus
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Niki Gedroic + Calina Creech224 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Briggs + Tracie Fitzgerald224 matchesnot enough data
Niki Gedroic + Laurie Hice033 matchesnot enough data
Susan Corpus + Suzanne Kraus213 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Hice + Calina Creech213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Calina Creech
71W–41L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Claire Fairchild
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Laurie Hice
11W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Niki Gedroic
17W–46L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
Susan Corpus
10W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
2.61
Robin King
1W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Tammy Briggs
7W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
Tracie Fitzgerald
5W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.44
Suzanne Kraus
29W–50L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.