Teams

RHaywood (OPRC)

2025 Adult Other 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 5.5 - Men - Thurs PM

9 players · average NTRP 5.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-17vs YSlesarev (Queens)Split 11
L#1 DoublesRob Haywood / John Carpenter vs Dananjaya Mayadunne / Sergey Belov6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDiego Goya vs Evgeny Slesarev6-2, 6-3
2025-04-15vs YSlesarev (Queens)Won 30
W#1 DoublesRob Haywood / Paolo Bompieri vs Dananjaya Mayadunne / Sergey Belov6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDiego Goya vs Evgeny Slesarev7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRodrigo Pacheco / Gregory Artzt vs Willie Dann / Tanner Haddon7-5, 7-5
2025-04-03vs YSlesarev (Queens)Won 20
W#1 DoublesDiego Goya / Mitch Sprengelmeyer vs Sergey Belov / Matthew Waissen7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRob Haywood vs Dananjaya Mayadunne6-3, 6-3
2025-03-27vs YSlesarev (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRodrigo Pacheco / Kavir Kumar vs Quinn Carmean / Grant Stuckey6-0, 6-2
2025-03-20vs YSlesarev (Queens)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMitch Sprengelmeyer / Sam Dean vs David Hager / Grant Stuckey6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTim Kullick vs Willie Dann6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRob Haywood / Rodrigo Pacheco vs Dananjaya Mayadunne / Evgeny Slesarev0-1
2025-03-13vs YSlesarev (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMitch Sprengelmeyer / Rob Haywood vs Dananjaya Mayadunne / Evgeny Slesarev7-6, 6-2
2025-03-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesKavir Kumar / Christopher Sheehan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 5.5 - Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.82 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.97
Kavir Kumar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.88
Sam Dean
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Diego Goya
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.61
Rob Haywood
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Gregory Artzt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mitch Sprengelmeyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Paolo Bompieri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rodrigo Pacheco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tim Kullick
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Kavir Kumar
26W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.97
Sam Dean
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.88
5
Diego Goya
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rob Haywood
8W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.61
Gregory Artzt
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mitch Sprengelmeyer
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paolo Bompieri
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rodrigo Pacheco
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tim Kullick
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.