Teams

Marco YMCA - D. Snyder

2022 Collier Adult 55 & Over Fall · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-12-09vs World Tennis Club - K. PhillipsWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Campbell / Shirley Steffen vs Kathleen Phillips / Cathy Miles6-2, 6-2
2021-12-02vs Players Club - M. AbramsWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Campbell / Dana Sacks vs Patrice Clapacs / Karen Terzano6-4, 6-3
2021-11-30vs Pelican Marsh - BishopLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Campbell / Susan Julich vs Elizabeth Giannetti / Helena Roeper4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDana Sacks / Denise Snyder vs Diane Gurba / Kalli Kustas4-6, 1-6
2021-11-11vs Players Club - DasilvaWon 10
W#1 DoublesDawn Amato / Lisa Campbell vs Patricia Abramowitz / Gabriele Woodruff7-5, 7-5
2021-10-28vs Bonita National - FlaggSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDawn Amato / Lisa Campbell vs Diane Mancini / Linda Larsen7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDana Sacks / Shirley Steffen vs Susan Flagg / Jane Doe6-2, 6-2
2021-10-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesDawn Amato / Dana Sacks vs Nancy Hughes / Catherine Booth6-1, 6-1
2021-10-14vs Talis Park - MatallahSplit 11
W#1 DoublesShirley Steffen / Susan Julich vs Becky Bush / Susan Lindberg6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Miller / Dana Sacks vs Gail Sousa / Andrea Maatallah6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Shirley Steffen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.53
Dana Sacks
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.45
Lisa Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Susan Julich
published
3.23
Lori Ceryak
published
3.22
Monica Erne
published
3.18
Jan Jackman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Campbell + Shirley Steffen19659% games+5.5% vs expected
Dana Sacks + Shirley Steffen7453% games+4.2% vs expected
Lisa Campbell + Dana Sacks14954% games−4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Shirley Steffen
171W–128L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.56
4
Dana Sacks
218W–149L career · 5 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
Lisa Campbell
131W–100L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
Susan Julich
26W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
Lori Ceryak
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Monica Erne
12W–4L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Jan Jackman
12W–34L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.