Teams

Wilson Tri 40+

2025 SOUTH EAST TENNIS TRI-LEVEL 40 & OVER · WOMEN TRI-LEVEL 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-21vs Adams TriWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Straub / Michelle Leonard vs Jennifer Adams / Candy Garrett3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-20vs Adams TriWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristin Main / Renata Kuperus vs Kimberly Selsky / Jennifer Adams6-1, 6-1
2025-08-10vs Adams TriWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatie Swain / Stacey Anderson vs Candy Garrett / Kim Morris6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLinda Wilson / Sara Borcherding vs Barbara Pennington / Mary Holland6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesShelley Livengood / Leigh Burris vs Marni Ferner / Stephanie Wagner6-0, 6-2
2025-08-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Straub / Katie Swain vs Allison Horton / Kim Morris6-1, 6-1
2025-08-03vs Adams TriWon 10
W#1 DoublesStacey Anderson / Kristin Main vs Jennifer Adams / Kimberly Selsky6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN TRI-LEVEL 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Renata Kuperus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Kristin Main
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Katie Swain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.07
Melissa Straub
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Logan Sullivan
published
3.34
Leigh Burris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Melissa Bourne
published
2.99
Shelley Livengood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Tracy Pierson
published
Linda Wilson
published
Sara Borcherding
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Burris + Tracy Pierson213 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Main + Renata Kuperus303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Renata Kuperus
82W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%14%
4.35
4.5
Kristin Main
123W–55L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
Katie Swain
31W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.10
4
Melissa Straub
204W–69L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
4.07
Logan Sullivan
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Leigh Burris
53W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Melissa Bourne
36W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.17
Shelley Livengood
29W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Tracy Pierson
40W–43L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
2.94
Linda Wilson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Borcherding
14W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.