Teams

KY/LOU/MCCLAIN

2025 USTA COMBO 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-20vs KY/LOU/SCHARF/FEDERICOLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Kellerman / Robin Scarbrough vs Joanna Federico / Deena Neimat2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKyra Frederick / Pamela Royster vs Leslie Gilkey / Kristina Quigley6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShin Kang / Jenny Ballard vs Elizabeth Austin / Becky Duncan6-4, 6-3
2025-08-17vs KY/LOU/SCHARF/FEDERICOLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Riley / Pamela Royster vs Elizabeth Austin / Meghan Myron6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephanie Kellerman / Sandy Edwards vs Leslie Gilkey / Christy Wallace1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKyra Frederick / Jenny Ballard vs Amanda Sutherland / Kate Bailey2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-26vs KY/LOU/SCHARF/FEDERICOWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Kellerman / Robin Scarbrough vs Elizabeth Austin / Deena Neimat7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRobbyn McClain / Ursula Melhuish vs Brittany Burt / Meghan Myron1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJenny Ballard / Josephine Shapira vs Amanda Scharf / Kristina Quigley4-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Carrie Merrill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
Jina Kang
published
2.92
Robbyn McClain
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Kyra Frederick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Stephanie Kellerman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.66
Ursula Melhuish
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Robin Scarbrough
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Cyndi Sullivan
published 3
2.35
Jenny Ballard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Pamela Royster
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.15
Sandy Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Josephine Shapira
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carrie Merrill
30W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Jina Kang
20W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Robbyn McClain
35W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
2.92
Kyra Frederick
15W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.90
Stephanie Kellerman
21W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Ursula Melhuish
23W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%1%
2.66
Robin Scarbrough
22W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%37%63%
2.55
3
Cyndi Sullivan
10W–17L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
Jenny Ballard
10W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.35
Pamela Royster
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
Sandy Edwards
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
Josephine Shapira
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.