Teams

Southampton Lane / Greiner

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-17Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCourtney Greiner / Karen Johnson vs Ashley Hart / Kathryn Brotherton6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-06-15Split 11
W#1 DoublesLogan Stone / Courtney Greiner vs Kathryn Brotherton / Kristen Crosthwaite5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Earley / Sandra Mason vs Laura Granger / Anne Elles6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-06-13vs Raintree McGarityLost 02
L#1 DoublesKarna Hyman / Emily Huang vs Lauren McCormick / Jill Campbell3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCourtney Greiner / Karen Johnson vs Angela Verdery / Irina Schaffernoth5-7, 5-7
2022-06-10vs HCC HolmesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCherie Lane / Courtney Greiner vs Michelle Holmes / Susan Hanson2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEmily Huang / Karen Johnson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-06vs CCV AlleyWon 20
W#2 DoublesCourtney Greiner / Haley Kutner vs Teresa Whitworth / Kirkland Hagerty4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEmily Huang / Karna Hyman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-03vs SCC BerryLost 01
L#3 DoublesCourtney Greiner / Elizabeth Taylor vs Suzanna King / Tamara Beck Jacquet7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-05-23Split 11
L#2 DoublesCourtney Greiner / Emily Huang vs Angela Verdery / Irina Schaffernoth2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLaura Earley / Sandra Mason vs Tarja Kostin / Lila LaCroix6-2, 6-3
2022-05-20vs HCC HolmesLost 02
L#1 DoublesCourtney Greiner / Carol Gregory vs Susan Hanson / Michelle Holmes3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaVera Williams / Laura Earley vs Joy Lareau / Pamela Luse4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Logan Stone
published
4.26
Haley Kutner
published 4.5
4.13
Courtney Greiner
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.08
Laura Earley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.01
Logan Glen
published
3.98
Crystal Gibson
published 4
3.89
Carol Gregory
published 4.5
3.73
Emily Huang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.58
LaVera Williams
published
Karna Hyman
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Logan Stone
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Haley Kutner
6W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
4.26
4.5
Courtney Greiner
117W–118L career · 8 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Laura Earley
83W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
4.08
Logan Glen
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
4.01
4
Crystal Gibson
24W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.98
4.5
Carol Gregory
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
3.89
4
Emily Huang
44W–58L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
LaVera Williams
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
Karna Hyman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.