Teams

Avila Lynam MXD 8.0

USTA MXD DOUBLES 18 & OVER · CC USTA MXD 8.0 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-04-01vs CC-LLW-AG Lysobey MXD 8.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Adam / Ken Johnston vs Dagne Ricci / Derek Glas6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-03-17vs CC-LLW-AG Lysobey MXD 8.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesKen Johnston / Michelle Adam vs Susan Daymude / AJ Daymude2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-18vs CC-LLW-AG Lysobey MXD 8.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKen Johnston / Michelle Adam vs AJ Daymude / Susan Daymude6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2022-02-12vs SMCC Haskell MXD 8.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesKen Johnston / Michelle Adam vs Wade McBride / Maribel Orozco5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-01-29vs CC-LLW-AG Lysobey MXD 8.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Adam / Ken Johnston vs Susan Daymude / AJ Daymude7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-01-14vs SMCC Haskell MXD 8.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Adam / Ken Johnston vs Mark Minnoch / Julie Slider6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CC USTA MXD 8.0 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Michelle Adam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
Lisa Corrente
published
3.37
Steve Gordon
published
3.32
Fred Mina
published 3.5
3.29
Karen Gordon
published
3.29
Deborah VANDENBERG
published 3.5
3.26
Kris Smetzer
published
3.16
Lukas Amler
published
3.13
Deborah Cherry
published 3.5
3.03
Bonnie Lynam
published 3
John Lyle
published
Ken Johnston
published
Michael Stanton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Gordon + Deborah VANDENBERG4346% games−0.3% vs expected
Ken Johnston + John Lyle123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michelle Adam
67W–62L career · 6 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
Lisa Corrente
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Steve Gordon
18W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Fred Mina
29W–22L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
Karen Gordon
28W–28L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Deborah VANDENBERG
24W–14L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Kris Smetzer
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Lukas Amler
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Deborah Cherry
12W–13L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Bonnie Lynam
18W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
John Lyle
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ken Johnston
12W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Stanton
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.