Teams

Pinellas/Pulley/50&Over7.5W

2024 Pinellas Combo 50 & Over Fall · 7.5 W Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-12-07vs Pinellas/Braudis/50&Over7.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesJudy Carlin / Anne Pulley vs Morgan Domson / Teresa Orr6-2, 6-1
2024-11-09vs Innisbrook VogeleyWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnne Pulley / Judy Carlin vs Michele Vogeley / Mona Patel6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLisa Oonk / Emily Signoracci vs Nancy van Winter / Micki Arnold3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-05vs McMullen RebelsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnne Pulley / Judy Carlin vs Karen Fischer / Monica Sanchez6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesEmily Signoracci / Lisa Oonk vs Cheryl Pawlowski / Kelly Moore6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Ethel Murphy
published
3.87
Anne Pulley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Lisa Oonk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Emily Signoracci
published
3.42
Kay Caldwell
published
3.42
Ann Worthington
published 3.5
3.34
Debbie Dawson
published 3.5
Janet Matthews
published
Mickie Gelestor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Dawson + Ann Worthington6266% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ethel Murphy
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.90
4
Anne Pulley
67W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Lisa Oonk
217W–231L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Emily Signoracci
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Kay Caldwell
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.42
3.5
Ann Worthington
12W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Debbie Dawson
18W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Janet Matthews
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mickie Gelestor
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.