Teams

Hidden Hills - Xu

2022 Duval Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-27vs AldenWon 10
W#1 DoublesViolet Deen / William Jahn vs Troy Patton / Megan Alfano6-4, 6-3
2022-07-22vs AldenWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoe Drab / Sharon Hapsis vs Jen Bates / Brian McIntire6-1, 7-5
2022-06-24vs Pace Island - PinhoWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Deen / Lesley Williams vs Kim Barelare / Norman Barelare6-3, 6-4
2022-06-10vs DUVAL/Minemier - JBTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesViolet Deen / William Jahn vs Darin Pobst / Becky Consunji2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJeff Darnall / Michelle Jahn vs Eric Minemier / Michelle Reid6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-03vs Planet Swim - SimonWon 10
W#1 DoublesViolet Deen / William Jahn vs Lisa Simon / Josh Schwartz5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-05-13Lost 01
L#3 DoublesWilliam Jahn / Olivia Markham vs Lauren Schilkofski / Earl Yates III4-6, 0-6
2022-05-06vs Baymeadows - CruzSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRobert Deen / Sharon Hapsis vs Rainer Kinhofer / Courtney Luffler3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Jahn / Joe Drab vs Annalee Lansang / Adam Rutstein6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Violet Deen
published
3.99
Lesley Williams
published
3.66
Bradley Moe
published 4
3.42
Michelle Jahn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Olivia Markham
published
Jeff Darnall
published
Joe Drab
published
Michael Griffith
published
Robert Deen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Hapsis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shawn Stoddard
published
William Jahn
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Jahn + William Jahn4357% gamesnot enough data
Violet Deen + Shawn Stoddard2351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Violet Deen
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
4.22
Lesley Williams
42W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Bradley Moe
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
Michelle Jahn
68W–143L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
Olivia Markham
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
Jeff Darnall
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joe Drab
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Griffith
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Deen
35W–43L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sharon Hapsis
79W–57L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shawn Stoddard
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
William Jahn
24W–35L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.