Teams

SYR: SFTC - Wallenstein

2023 Tri Level Men · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.70 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-13Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBrett Sullivan / Brian Emigholz vs Ryan Davis / James Orr2-6, 4-6
2022-12-18vs FergusonLost 01
L#3 DoublesKenneth Alweis / Colin Leonard vs Joseph Branagan / Richard Ingraham3-6, 2-6
2022-12-11vs Western: BradleyLost 01
L#2 DoublesJesse Daino / Karl Offen vs Ryu Kim / Bong Gee Jang1-6, 3-6
2022-12-04vs Drumlins - GearyWon 10
W#3 DoublesDanilo Fernando / Kyle Voyer vs William Murray / Richard Price4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-11-20vs FergusonWon 10
W#3 DoublesZunli Lu / Kyle Voyer vs Joseph Branagan / Nikhil Joshi6-4, 6-3
2022-11-13vs 40-LOVEWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrett Sullivan / Brian Emigholz vs Joon Young Kim / Wonhee Cho6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesColin Leonard / Danilo Fernando vs Ben Jung / Myong Won Seo6-2, 6-1
2022-10-30vs FergusonWon 21
L#1 DoublesNathanael Kelley / Brett Sullivan vs Michael Green / Ben Weiss2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNorifumi Urao / Jesse Daino vs Mike Heinz / Paul McMurtrie6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKyle Voyer / Zunli Lu vs Joseph Branagan / Richard Ingraham4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-10-16vs Drumlins - GearyLost 01
L#3 DoublesKenneth Alweis / Danilo Fernando vs Steve Brandt / Michael Sikora6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SYR: SFTC - Wallenstein7219818176
240-LOVE63161125232
3Ferguson2772041284

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Brian Emigholz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.92
Brett Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.91
Michael Leopold
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.63
Norifumi Urao
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.63
Jackson Bradley
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.54
Jonathan Dee
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.48
Kyle Voyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Robert Auler
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.47
Zunli Lu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Nathanael Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Karl Offen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Andrew Wallenstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Danilo Fernando
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Colin Leonard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jesse Daino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kenneth Alweis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brett Sullivan + Jackson Bradley3254% games+20.9% vs expected
Jonathan Dee + Norifumi Urao23367% games+11.0% vs expected
Karl Offen + Kyle Voyer4357% games+1.3% vs expected
Jonathan Dee + Kyle Voyer6256% games+1.2% vs expected
Robert Auler + Jackson Bradley2744% games−0.1% vs expected
Brian Emigholz + Jackson Bradley4354% games−0.4% vs expected
Michael Leopold + Kyle Voyer8361% games−2.1% vs expected
Brian Emigholz + Robert Auler1650% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Emigholz
58W–57L career · 14 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.96
4.5
Brett Sullivan
10W–16L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.92
4
Michael Leopold
81W–22L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%74%25%
3.91
3.5
Norifumi Urao
114W–34L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.63
4
Jackson Bradley
141W–81L career · 11 lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
3.5
Jonathan Dee
88W–58L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Kyle Voyer
117W–50L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.48
Robert Auler
45W–63L career · 7 lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.47
Zunli Lu
11W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.47
Nathanael Kelley
30W–16L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Karl Offen
53W–59L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Andrew Wallenstein
38W–43L career · 1 line in 2023
4%92%3%
3.24
3
Danilo Fernando
25W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.13
Colin Leonard
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jesse Daino
22W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kenneth Alweis
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.