Pautsch/Sullivan/Bella Vista

2026 Mixed 65 & Over · 3.5 Mixed-LLS

8 players · average NTRP — / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →

Schedule4 played

2026-08-23vs Furnish/Benton/BPWon 2–1

L#1 DoublesRichard Branam / Judith Haines vs David Luneau / Terri Luneau0-6, 1-6

W#2 DoublesTim Sullivan / Vickie Adkins vs Keith Skinner / Judy Furnish6-0, 6-1

W#3 DoublesPaul Pautsch / Kitti Severns vs Schelle Fike / Robert Lee4-6, 6-2, 1-0

2026-08-22vs Furnish/Benton/BPWon 2–1

W#1 DoublesTim Sullivan / Vickie Adkins vs David Luneau / Terri Luneau7-6, 7-5

W#2 DoublesRon Gass / Sandy Stursma vs Terry Richard / Schelle Fike6-1, 6-1

L#3 DoublesPaul Pautsch / Kitti Severns vs Keith Skinner / Judy Furnish4-6, 7-5, 0-1

2026-08-22vs Furnish/Benton/BPWon 3–0

W#1 DoublesRickard Hood / Leigh Wendlandt vs Brenda Scheffler / Anthony Kovacevic6-3, 6-2

W#2 DoublesRichard Branam / Judith Haines vs David Luneau / Terri Luneau7-5, 6-3

W#3 DoublesTim Sullivan / Vickie Adkins vs Sip Mouden / Robert Lee6-1, 6-2

2026-08-21vs Furnish/Benton/BPWon 3–0

W#1 DoublesRon Gass / Sandy Stursma vs Schelle Fike / Terry Richard6-1, 6-2

W#2 DoublesRickard Hood / Leigh Wendlandt vs Sip Mouden / Robert Lee6-2, 7-5

W#3 DoublesRichard Branam / Judith Haines vs Brenda Scheffler / Anthony Kovacevic3-6, 6-2, 1-0

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed-LLS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50

Sandy Stursma

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published —

3.42

Paul Pautsch

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published —

3.40

Rickard Hood

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published —

3.39

Richard Branam

usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published —

3.35

Vickie Adkins

usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

3.26

Leigh Wendlandt

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published —

3.26

Judith Haines

usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published —

3.24

Kitti Severns

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Branam + Judith Haines	2–1	3 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—

Sandy Stursma

17W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026

<1%51%49%

3.50

—

Paul Pautsch

5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026

<1%71%29%

3.42

—

Rickard Hood

29W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026

<1%76%23%

3.40

—

Richard Branam

15W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026

<1%79%21%

3.39

—

Vickie Adkins

29W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026

1%85%15%

3.35

—

Leigh Wendlandt

35W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026

3%92%5%

3.26

—

Judith Haines

11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026

3%92%4%

3.26

—

Kitti Severns

20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026

5%92%3%

3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.