Teams

COLLIER / K. Keillor

2023 Collier Adult 55 & Over Fall · Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-09vs Players Club - RoseWon 20
W#1 DoublesCheryl Copps / Hope Malin vs Sandy Brewer / Coral-Jeanne O'Connor6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKate Keillor / Sally Amato vs Pam Ammar / Gerrie Logan4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-12-02vs Players Club - J.PearsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Copps / Hope Malin vs Yvette Harrison / Rhonda Lombardi6-1, 6-2
2022-11-25vs Marco Ymca - HailSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCheryl Copps / Hope Malin vs Marla Hoffman / Joyce Hail6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKate Keillor / Jennifer Amaya vs Neli Nelz / Susan Rafferty3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-11-18vs Island Walk - ConawaySplit 11
L#1 DoublesKate Keillor / Jennifer Amaya vs Mary Conaway / Joni Heil3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCheryl Copps / Caroline Folkman vs DEBRA BATES / Mary Orlando7-6, 6-2
2022-11-11vs Village Walk Bonita - J. MartinSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCheryl Copps / Maureen Rennie vs Mary McIntire / Marcia Kenyon6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKate Keillor / Vicki MacE vs Janet Martin / Diane Cosner2-6, 0-6
2022-11-04vs Worthington - KennedyWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaureen Rennie / Cheryl Copps vs Robin Gale / Ellen Hersey6-4, 6-4
2022-10-28vs Sterling Oaks - BergstromWon 20
W#1 DoublesKate Keillor / Sally Amato vs Jeri Carley / Mary Feldman7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCheryl Copps / Vicki MacE vs Anne Pauls / Susan Weinman6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-10-21vs The Quarry - PecoraroWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Copps / Maureen Rennie vs Norma Goldman / Barbara Gettenberg6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Hope Malin
published 3.5
3.11
Jennifer Amaya
published
3.07
Maureen Rennie
published
2.94
Cheryl Copps
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.93
Monique Berlinger
published
Hilda Champion
published 3
2.71
Kate Keillor
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Sally Amato
published
Vicki MacE
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Copps + Kate Keillor182849% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Copps + Jennifer Amaya213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hope Malin
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Jennifer Amaya
25W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
3.11
Maureen Rennie
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Cheryl Copps
235W–133L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.94
Monique Berlinger
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Hilda Champion
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Kate Keillor
171W–148L career · 5 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
2.71
Sally Amato
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Vicki MacE
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.