Teams

LCTA18/Lawley/St.George

18 & Over Combo · 5.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-10-28vs LCTA18/Rogers/DannyJonesLost 02
L#1 DoublesGeorge Lamont Perry / Richard Sutcliffe vs Grady Rogers / Slava Zeif6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDon Lawley / Robert Bessent vs Rob Dauch / Kevin Chisholm2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Richard Sutcliffe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Robert Bessent
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Don Lawley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Charlie Weeks
published 2.5
2.09
Nathan Nesmith
published
Allen Brownlee
published
Drew Sosebee
published
George Lamont Perry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jaleel Jennings
published
James Brownlee
published
Randy Blevins
published
Vic Simon
published
William Carter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Don Lawley + Robert Bessent5361% games+14.4% vs expected
Vic Simon + Richard Sutcliffe3644% games+9.3% vs expected
Don Lawley + Richard Sutcliffe7648% games+6.1% vs expected
Nathan Nesmith + Robert Bessent3352% games+5.3% vs expected
George Lamont Perry + Richard Sutcliffe2348% games+1.8% vs expected
George Lamont Perry + Don Lawley0533% gamesnot enough data
William Carter + Don Lawley4158% gamesnot enough data
Allen Brownlee + Richard Sutcliffe314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Sutcliffe
55W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Robert Bessent
27W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Don Lawley
46W–49L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
2.5
Charlie Weeks
1W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nathan Nesmith
13W–64L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Allen Brownlee
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Drew Sosebee
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
George Lamont Perry
25W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jaleel Jennings
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
James Brownlee
15W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Randy Blevins
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vic Simon
14W–36L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
William Carter
41W–43L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.