Teams

Hester

2026 Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.36 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-08vs KochLost 12
W#1 DoublesRussell Hester / Neal Nottrott vs Michael Ritter / Michael McGowan5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Mason / Michael Smith vs George Sybert / Mark Tindall3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDana Dolvin / William Ravekes vs Joseph Flynn / William Willard1-6, 4-6
2026-06-04vs KochLost 12
L#1 DoublesRussell Hester / Neal Nottrott vs Scott A Green / Frank von Hendricks3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesEric Price / David Mason vs Michael Ritter / Joseph Flynn2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesWilliam Ravekes / Frank Burnett vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-28vs KochLost 03
L#1 DoublesFrank Burnett / Shaun Edwards vs Scott A Green / Mike Kelly2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDana Dolvin / Scott Stickels vs Greg Koch / Frank von Hendricks2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKarl Gordon / Eric Price vs Michael Ritter / Mark Tindall2-6, 0-6
2026-05-18vs KochLost 03
L#1 DoublesNeal Nottrott / Steven Harper vs George Sybert / Scott A Green2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKarl Gordon / David Mason vs William Willard / Michael Remoll3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesFrank Burnett / William Ravekes vs Michael Bernhard / Andrew Mullins3-6, 3-6
2026-05-12vs KochLost 03
L#1 DoublesShaun Edwards / David Mason vs Michael McGowan / Michael Ritter6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesFrank Burnett / Michael Smith vs Michael Bernhard / George Sybert3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDana Dolvin / Eric Price vs Joseph Flynn / Michael Remoll2-6, 2-6
2026-05-06vs KochLost 03
L#1 DoublesRussell Hester / Neal Nottrott vs Scott A Green / Mike Kelly0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFrank Burnett / Karl Gordon vs Greg Koch / Andrew Mullins3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDana Dolvin / Scott Stickels vs Mark Tindall / William Willard0-6, 4-6
2026-04-28vs KochLost 12
W#1 DoublesShaun Edwards / Russell Hester vs Michael McGowan / Michael Ritter1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSteven Harper / Neal Nottrott vs Andrew Mullins / George Sybert6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDavid Mason / William Ravekes vs Michael Bernhard / William Willard3-6, 4-6
2026-04-22vs KochLost 12
W#1 DoublesRussell Hester / Neal Nottrott vs Frank von Hendricks / Mike Kelly6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMichael Smith / Dana Dolvin vs Michael Ritter / Michael Bernhard5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKarl Gordon / Steven Harper vs Mark Tindall / Joseph Flynn0-6, 0-6
2026-04-15vs KochLost 03
L#1 DoublesShaun Edwards / Russell Hester vs George Sybert / Scott A Green4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesScott Stickels / Steven Harper vs Greg Koch / Frank von Hendricks2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesFrank Burnett / Michael Smith vs Michael McGowan / Michael Remoll2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hester0942348304

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Neal Nottrott
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.27
Shaun Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Russell Hester
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Scott Stickels
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
David Mason
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.12
William Ravekes
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.10
Eric Price
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Frank Burnett
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
2.97
Steven Harper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Dana Dolvin
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
Karl Gordon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frank Burnett + William Ravekes81448% gamesnot enough data
Frank Burnett + Russell Hester4550% gamesnot enough data
Neal Nottrott + Russell Hester224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Neal Nottrott
64W–43L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Shaun Edwards
16W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Russell Hester
46W–66L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Scott Stickels
28W–68L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
David Mason
30W–61L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
3
William Ravekes
120W–88L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.12
Eric Price
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Frank Burnett
71W–113L career · 11 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
Steven Harper
0W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Dana Dolvin
3W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Karl Gordon
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.