Teams

Cross Court: Good Friends

2024 18&Over Women · 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-07-15vs Break Point 1Won 30
W#1 DoublesJuliet Harvey / Laura Liebeck-Smith vs Joanne Arcadipane / Sarah Barish2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEileen Kaisik vs Kallie Robertson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlicia Estes / Leslee Bowman vs Beka Goedde / Kristen Druse6-2, 6-1
2024-07-09vs Cross Court: One LoveWon 30
W#1 DoublesMahbobe Ghods / Alicia Estes vs Darlene Brandow / Katherine Stikkers6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesGhizlane Lehjel vs Alexa Santucci6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLaura Liebeck-Smith / Juliet Harvey vs Jennifer Spreer / Sheri Lynch3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-26vs WTLOVSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLeslee Bowman / Eileen Kaisik vs Kim Cantine / Michele Eldon2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAlicia Estes vs Kim McConville7-5, 6-2
2024-06-17vs TSR: Team FunLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeslee Bowman / Juliet Harvey vs Brianne Butler / Christa Tomasulo5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesGhizlane Lehjel vs Lisette Aller1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesEmily Goodman / Eileen Kaisik vs Melissa Russo / Lori Kermel1-6, 2-6
2024-06-10vs Break Point Tennis - ALost 12
L#1 DoublesAlicia Estes / Eileen Kaisik vs Ivonne Santoyo-Orozco / Lyla Arenfeld1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesGhizlane Lehjel vs Hannah Keggins6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMahbobe Ghods / Leslee Bowman vs Patty Gandin / Stephanie Bassler6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-06-03vs TSR: RandLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Goodman / Juliet Harvey vs Jennifer Tice / Susan Kraus3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesGhizlane Lehjel vs Irene Benvenuto1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlicia Estes / Leslee Bowman vs Laurie Hutchison / Maria Kurshan3-6, 4-6
2024-05-20vs Taconic RacquettesLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Goodman / Ghizlane Lehjel vs Jody Milholm / Heather Ostman4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAlicia Estes vs Lois Petrone6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLeslee Bowman / Eileen Kaisik vs Karlee Kussel / Alicia Lore1-6, 2-6
2024-05-13vs Break Point 1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Goodman / Leslee Bowman vs Joanne Arcadipane / Kristen Druse3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesGhizlane Lehjel vs Lisa Sanditz4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlicia Estes / Mahbobe Ghods vs Sarah Barish / Kallie Robertson6-2, 6-0
2024-05-06vs Cross Court: One LoveWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlicia Estes / Eileen Kaisik vs Jennifer Spreer / Katherine Stikkers6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesGhizlane Lehjel vs Kristina Rapiel6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Liebeck-Smith / Juliet Harvey vs Courtney Tsahalis / Darlene Brandow6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TSR: Team Fun09171024238
2Cross Court: Good Friends09141329226
3Taconic Racquettes0952244282
4Cross Court: One Love0962145303

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.49
Juliet Harvey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.46
Alicia Estes
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.31
Laura Liebeck-Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.08
Leslee Bowman
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.04
Mahbobe Ghods
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.04
Eileen Kaisik
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Emily Goodman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Ghizlane Lehjel
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juliet Harvey + Laura Liebeck-Smith7351% games+1.2% vs expected
Alicia Estes + Eileen Kaisik3443% games−3.6% vs expected
Alicia Estes + Juliet Harvey033 matchesnot enough data
Emily Goodman + Leslee Bowman123 matchesnot enough data
Emily Goodman + Eileen Kaisik123 matchesnot enough data
Leslee Bowman + Eileen Kaisik033 matchesnot enough data
Leslee Bowman + Laura Liebeck-Smith033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Juliet Harvey
18W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.49
3
Alicia Estes
17W–15L career · 8 lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
2.46
Laura Liebeck-Smith
9W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
2.31
Leslee Bowman
6W–29L career · 7 lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
2.08
Mahbobe Ghods
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
2.04
Eileen Kaisik
10W–22L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Emily Goodman
12W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ghizlane Lehjel
7W–6L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.