Teams

NJ NAVY

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 5.0 - 18 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 4.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-02vs GAC MAROONWon 30
W#1 DoublesYana Ruegsegger / Zsofia Alfonso vs Michelle Miller / Erin Eggland6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesGinger Phillips vs Kelly Cohen6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Sulahian / Heather Young vs Kerry Callaghan / Emily Mone6-2, 6-1
2021-05-26vs TTA BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesZsofia Alfonso / Yana Ruegsegger vs Kimberly Pettijohn / Kara Gerczynski6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesGinger Phillips vs Tanya Cumalat6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKristin Warren / Michelle Sulahian vs Jasmine Muniz-Cadorette / Madison Hoffman6-4, 6-3
2021-05-19vs GTC GOLDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesYana Ruegsegger / Kristin Warren vs Tori Almagno / Stephanie Jasper6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHailey Suyumov / Michelle Sulahian vs Jenny Wiens / Sarah Marks6-4, 6-2
2021-05-12vs GAC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesHailey Suyumov / Kristin Warren vs Kelly Buckley / Anastassiya Zherdeva4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesGinger Phillips vs Veronika Bruetting4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesZsofia Alfonso / Yana Ruegsegger vs Simona Bruetting / Taylor Casey7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-04-30vs TTA BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesZsofia Alfonso / Yana Ruegsegger vs Karolina Ottem / Madison Hoffman6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesGinger Phillips vs Kimberly Pettijohn6-4, 6-1
2021-04-28vs GAC MAROONWon 20
W#1 DoublesHailey Suyumov / Kristin Warren vs Leslie Mease / Kelly Cohen6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesGinger Phillips vs Emily Mone6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 5.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.79 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.19
Yana Ruegsegger
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.86
Hailey Suyumov
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.84
Zsofia Alfonso
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.72
Michelle Sulahian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.57
Kimberly Greason
published
4.55
Ginger Phillips
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Kristin Warren
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zsofia Alfonso + Yana Ruegsegger20270% games+8.7% vs expected
Michelle Sulahian + Hailey Suyumov224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Yana Ruegsegger
60W–16L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%7%93%
5.19
5
Hailey Suyumov
83W–31L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
4.86
5
Zsofia Alfonso
51W–15L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
4.84
Michelle Sulahian
32W–12L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.72
Kimberly Greason
21W–17L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
4.57
4.5
Ginger Phillips
34W–10L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%34%66%
4.55
Kristin Warren
26W–12L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.