Teams

CM NAVY

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-15vs CACM GREYLost 01
L#2 SinglesCraig Ricketts vs Brian Gurinsky2-6, 0-6
2024-05-01vs GTC BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeff Robert / Craig Ricketts vs Chris Donald / Robert Cohen6-2, 6-1
2024-04-24vs CACM BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeff Robert / Craig Ricketts vs Jimmie Rose / Jeff Kinzler7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2024-04-17vs APR-MW BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesCraig Ricketts / Stan Goodreau vs KI KIM / Gaurav Shekhawat3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Alec Smith
published 4
3.84
Craig Ricketts
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.83
Richard Wilhelm
published
3.81
Kevin Ray
published
Brent Slosky
published 4
3.71
Douglas Sparks
published
3.61
Eli Anderson
published
3.61
Adam Barkin
published 4
3.61
Brian Turner
published 4
3.42
Jeff Robert
published
Don Parsons
published
Matthew Fortney
published
Stan Goodreau
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alec Smith + Craig Ricketts7260% games+9.2% vs expected
Don Parsons + Douglas Sparks1544% games−2.0% vs expected
Brent Slosky + Stan Goodreau134 matchesnot enough data
Richard Wilhelm + Douglas Sparks314 matchesnot enough data
Douglas Sparks + Kevin Ray224 matchesnot enough data
Alec Smith + Richard Wilhelm213 matchesnot enough data
Brent Slosky + Kevin Ray123 matchesnot enough data
Eli Anderson + Craig Ricketts123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alec Smith
18W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Craig Ricketts
104W–78L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.84
Richard Wilhelm
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.83
Kevin Ray
17W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Brent Slosky
4W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Christopher Frampton
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Douglas Sparks
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Eli Anderson
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Adam Barkin
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Brian Turner
5W–15L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
Jeff Robert
5W–15L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
3.42
Don Parsons
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Matthew Fortney
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stan Goodreau
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.