Teams

RED

2021 Adult 18 & Over Spring · Men 5.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.83 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-25vs STL/Jannett/18&Over5.0MWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Lesko / Ryan White vs Mario Gruden / Dylan Steffens3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChris Carpenter / Peter Gunther vs Shawn Weil / Rob White6-2, 6-2
2021-05-18vs STL/Jannett/18&Over5.0MWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichael Lesko / Jordan Snyder vs Dylan Steffens / Rob White4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesRyan White vs Nick Jannett6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChris Carpenter / Stephen Kadyk vs Mario Gruden / Shawn Weil6-1, 7-5
2021-05-11vs STL/Jannett/18&Over5.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesAdrian Beloqui / Derek Since vs Mario Gruden / Rob White2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJordan Snyder vs Dylan Steffens2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChris Carpenter / Michael Lesko vs Brandon Harris / Shawn Weil7-6, 6-1
2021-04-27vs STL/Jannett/18&Over5.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Lesko / Jordan Snyder vs Dylan Steffens / Rob White1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRyan White vs Martin Damm5-7, 5-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAdrian Beloqui / Chris Carpenter vs Nick Jannett / Shawn Weil6-2, 6-0
2021-04-13vs STL/Jannett/18&Over5.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Lesko / Jordan Snyder vs Martin Damm / Dylan Steffens6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAdrian Beloqui vs Rob White1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Gunther / Derek Since vs Brandon Harris / Nick Jannett7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STL/Jannett/18&Over5.0M328716123
2RED237817134

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.49 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.80
Derek Since
published 5
Adrian Beloqui
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
4.53
Michael Lesko
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.34
Chris Carpenter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.29
Ryan White
usually #1 Singles 69%, also #2 Singles 15% · published
Jordan Snyder
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Peter Gunther
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Stephen Kadyk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Lesko + Ryan White21163% games+9.9% vs expected
Jordan Snyder + Michael Lesko224 matchesnot enough data
Michael Lesko + Adrian Beloqui303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Derek Since
48W–29L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
4.80
5
Adrian Beloqui
12W–6L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Lesko
73W–34L career · 5 lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
4.53
4.5
Chris Carpenter
38W–13L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
4.34
Ryan White
131W–38L career · 13 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
4.29
Jordan Snyder
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Peter Gunther
43W–26L career · 11 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephen Kadyk
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.