Teams

RHCC RED

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.42 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-16vs KC-RH NAVYLost 04
L#1 DoublesPaul Grumann / Bryan Dahler vs Michael Hursta / Ben MacDonald6-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesCorey Crawford vs Robert Mason0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCharles Lucas / Alec Rossano vs Robert Carlson / Ken Sharpeta4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStephen Komon / Paul Kos vs Brian Sandy / Chris Martinez1-6, 2-6
2024-07-09vs MC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesBryan Dahler / Paul Grumann vs Nathan Knepper / Thomas Toomey6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDan Faath vs Jim Greiner6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStephen Komon / Charles Lucas vs Jerry Mogab / Kirk Chatawanich1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Anderson / Paul Kos vs Dan Parker / Mark Phillips1-6, 4-6
2024-07-02vs NJ YELLOWLost 04
L#1 DoublesCorey Crawford / Charles Lucas vs Kevin Thistle / John Hamilton6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChristopher Schillinger vs Tom Merkert5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBryan Dahler / Lee Tsuo vs WC Ackerman / Peter Malouff7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStephen Komon / Michael Anderson vs Brian Messer / Glenn Friedman6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2024-06-25vs MC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesCorey Crawford / Charles Lucas vs Ken Proc / Chris Vogelsang6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPaul Grumann vs Brad Arnold2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlec Rossano / Lee Tsuo vs Chris Driscoll / John Loomis2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Anderson / Paul Kos vs Matthew Moskal / Dave Evenson4-6, 2-6
2024-06-18vs NJ REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesCorey Crawford / Charles Lucas vs Roger Phillips / Amal Chandran3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDan Faath vs Todd Taylor6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesStephen Komon / Alec Rossano vs Jeff Richker / Sasha Shepard5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Anderson / Paul Kos vs Sean Mitchell / Rick Bonczynski6-4, 6-3
2024-06-11vs KC-RH NAVYLost 13
L#1 DoublesBryan Dahler / Paul Grumann vs Malcolm Walker / Ben MacDonald1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesChristopher Schillinger vs Michael Hursta6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephen Komon / Alec Rossano vs Ken Sharpeta / Sean Kavanaugh4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCharles Lucas / Lee Tsuo vs Jeff Eversman / Ronald Kaufman7-5, 7-5
2024-06-04vs MC BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesBryan Dahler / Paul Grumann vs Brian Fletcher / Kirk Chatawanich6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesDan Faath vs Claude Murray6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStephen Komon / Christopher Schillinger vs Jim Greiner / Michael Dill6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesCharles Lucas / Lee Tsuo vs Nathan Knepper / Andrew Payne6-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Dan Faath
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Paul Grumann
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Christopher Schillinger
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Charles Lucas
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.18
Lee Tsuo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Stephen Komon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Bryan Dahler
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.08
Corey Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
3.05
Alec Rossano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Paul Kos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Grumann + Bryan Dahler5452% games+8.4% vs expected
Charles Lucas + Corey Crawford2844% games+2.2% vs expected
Alec Rossano + Stephen Komon2445% games+1.9% vs expected
Bryan Dahler + Lee Tsuo0643% games+1.0% vs expected
Stephen Komon + Bryan Dahler1445% games+0.5% vs expected
Paul Grumann + Charles Lucas2348% games−5.7% vs expected
Stephen Komon + Lee Tsuo0531% games−18.5% vs expected
Alec Rossano + Charles Lucas134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dan Faath
20W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Paul Grumann
20W–24L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Christopher Schillinger
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Charles Lucas
14W–34L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
Lee Tsuo
13W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Stephen Komon
39W–78L career · 6 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Bryan Dahler
30W–46L career · 5 lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Corey Crawford
20W–54L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.08
3.5
Alec Rossano
11W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.05
Paul Kos
22W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.