Teams

Sneed/Memphis

2025 Adult 55 & Over-Memphis · 3.5 Women 55 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-19vs Kershner/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesDebra Sneed / Gina Simonetti vs Deborah Kershner / Kay Barcus6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMargaret Vestal / Karen Johnston vs Sharon Dertien / Dana Deviney5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVicki Singh / Andrea Bienstock vs Nan Gallina / Sandy Haddad2-6, 1-6
2025-04-12vs McCarty/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Guyton / Susan Doane vs Anne Higgins / Nancy Goodwin0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDebra Sneed / Beth Harty Evetts vs Eva Farris / Kecia Coleman6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMartha Podesta / Shelley Spiro vs Melony Bratton / Michele Smith3-6, 3-6
2025-04-08vs Rucker/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesMargaret Vestal / Debra Sneed vs Terrie Dietsch / Melinda Hoehn6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarroll Nenon / Karen Johnston vs Xiaoqun Akers / Mary Sutton6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Guyton / Martha Podesta vs Melinda Boudreau / Sandra Horn5-7, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Beth Harty Evetts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Gina Simonetti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Debra Sneed
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Shelley Spiro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Martha Podesta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Laura Cary
published
3.12
Andrea Bienstock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.12
Margaret Vestal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Susan Doane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Brenda Armstrong
published 3.5
Carroll Nenon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Vicki Singh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelley Spiro + Debra Sneed3451% games−0.2% vs expected
Shelley Spiro + Martha Podesta134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Harty Evetts
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Gina Simonetti
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Debra Sneed
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Shelley Spiro
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Martha Podesta
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Laura Cary
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
3
Andrea Bienstock
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
Margaret Vestal
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Susan Doane
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
3.5
Brenda Armstrong
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.86
3
Carroll Nenon
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Vicki Singh
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.