Teams

STC Robinson

2025 OH OV FALL A18&O Daytime · 3.5W Monday

16 players · average NTRP 3.42 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-12-16vs FSSC McDougallWon 10
W#1 DoublesSandy Alex / Michelle Conrad vs Lori James / Molly McKenna6-3, 6-4
2024-10-07vs FSSC McDougallWon 10
W#2 DoublesSandy Alex / Patricia Robinson vs Megan Popp / Kelsey Schuering6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Cindy Wehrkamp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Skylla Frye
published
3.32
Charlene Schmidt
published 3.5
3.26
Kristine McMaken
published
3.19
Sandy Alex
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Karen Stahl
published
2.98
Jacqueline Coffey
published 3.5
2.96
Annette Ross-Gray
published 3.5
2.90
Nancy Eben
published
2.82
Jennifer Arnett
published
2.69
Patricia Robinson
published
2.69
Terri Logan
published
2.65
Jacki Francis
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Lori Keller
published
Marianna Wright
published
Michelle Conrad
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Skylla Frye + Charlene Schmidt4354% games+11.8% vs expected
Karen Stahl + Cindy Wehrkamp6166% games+9.4% vs expected
Michelle Conrad + Patricia Robinson3449% games+7.8% vs expected
Terri Logan + Michelle Conrad1550% games+4.5% vs expected
Annette Ross-Gray + Patricia Robinson253448% games+2.3% vs expected
Jennifer Arnett + Patricia Robinson5944% games+1.5% vs expected
Skylla Frye + Terri Logan364146% games+0.8% vs expected
Nancy Eben + Jacki Francis11231% games−1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy Wehrkamp
123W–55L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
Skylla Frye
86W–75L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Charlene Schmidt
73W–66L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Kristine McMaken
75W–81L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Sandy Alex
53W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Karen Stahl
36W–31L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Jacqueline Coffey
54W–102L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
3.5
Annette Ross-Gray
82W–127L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
Nancy Eben
77W–130L career · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.90
Jennifer Arnett
61W–85L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Patricia Robinson
120W–269L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Terri Logan
86W–153L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Jacki Francis
41W–159L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
2.65
Lori Keller
19W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marianna Wright
27W–76L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Conrad
42W–48L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.