Teams

Submitted for a Refund I

2023 Z-Refunded Players · Combo

22 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Combo have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Candace Savage
published 4
3.63
Paige Lonergan
published
3.56
Gloria Hicks
published 4
3.43
Deborah Kershner
published 3.5
3.27
Patrick Kerley
published
3.27
Sun Hui Wright
published
Carolyn Wills
published 3.5
Dianne Wright
published 3.5
3.23
Carol Himmelstein
published 3.5
3.22
Catherine Eddy
published 3.5
3.21
Joanne Sandefer
published
3.05
Andrea Bienstock
published 3
2.85
Mary Sutton
published
2.83
Brian Eason
published 3
2.76
Staci Gill
published
2.58
Glaucia Novoa
published 3
2.56
Joshua Shipley
published
1.84
Anne Jordan
published 2.5
Audrey Wood
published
Marylyle Boolos
published
Sandy Haddad
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sun Hui Wright + Catherine Eddy5075% games+13.7% vs expected
Deborah Kershner + Sun Hui Wright314 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Kershner + Dianne Wright123 matchesnot enough data
Glaucia Novoa + Mary Sutton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Candace Savage
21W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
Paige Lonergan
27W–15L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Gloria Hicks
17W–32L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Deborah Kershner
64W–34L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
Patrick Kerley
21W–22L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Sun Hui Wright
32W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Carolyn Wills
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Dianne Wright
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Carol Himmelstein
11W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Catherine Eddy
50W–28L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
Joanne Sandefer
14W–5L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
3
Andrea Bienstock
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
Mary Sutton
23W–53L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Brian Eason
39W–30L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
2.83
Staci Gill
27W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Barbara Latiolais
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Glaucia Novoa
9W–33L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
2.58
Joshua Shipley
14W–26L career · no lines in 2023
0%33%67%
2.56
2.5
Anne Jordan
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.84
Audrey Wood
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marylyle Boolos
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandy Haddad
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.